This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 13, 2026. If you represent ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY, you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.
No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.
ESG & Compliance Snapshot
ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY
Last updated May 13, 2026
Located in Colorado County · Texas
Executive Summary
ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY, a privately held operation based in Altair, Texas (NAICS 42393, Recyclable Material Merchant Wholesalers), registers in EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online system under facility identifier 110067678622 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The numbers are stark. As of the ECHO data snapshot dated 2026-05-04, the single registered facility carries eight quarters of noncompliance within the trailing 24-month window and a derived penalty exposure of approximately $72.4 million, calculated by pro-rating the five-year total penalty figure reported in ECHO by a 24/60 factor [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The most recent active permit on record carries an issuance date of 2020-05-19, and the ECHO export reports zero currently active permits — a combination that warrants direct verification against Texas Commission on Environmental Quality records before any downstream modeling begins [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Because ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY is privately held, no SEC 10-K, 10-Q, or proxy filings are available on EDGAR for this entity, and the CIK field is null [source: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany]. No company-issued sustainability report, NGO litigation surface, state-level enforcement docket, or news coverage was returned by the research bundle for either the 30-day company window or the 365-day facility window. That absence of corroborating documents narrows this briefing to federal ECHO data and publicly accessible EPA program references [source: https://echo.epa.gov/]. Readers should treat the derived penalty figure as a mechanical extrapolation rather than a confirmed adjudicated sum. ECHO's own methodology notes that five-year penalty totals may include federal judicial, federal administrative, and state-reported penalties with varying degrees of finality [source: https://echo.epa.gov/help/facility-search/search-results-help].
Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)
What they say vs what EPA shows
No company-issued sustainability report, ESG disclosure, corporate responsibility statement, or CDP submission for ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY was returned by the supplied Brave SERP queries, and the entity is private with no CIK and no SEC EDGAR filings [source: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany]. The research bundle's sustainability-report SERP result set is empty, and no parent-company disclosure has been linked to the Altair, Texas site in the supplied data [source: https://search.brave.com/]. Without stated commitments, a side-by-side comparison of claimed environmental performance against measured EPA outcomes cannot be constructed from the record provided. What can be documented is the measured side of the ledger only.
On that measured side, EPA ECHO reports eight quarters of noncompliance in the trailing 24 months for facility 110067678622, a derived penalty total of $72,404,961.60, zero active permits as of the 2026-05-04 snapshot, and a most-recent permit date of 2020-05-19 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The gap between the absence of public environmental commitments and the presence of a substantial ECHO compliance footprint is itself the finding. Private-company status under NAICS 42393 does not trigger SEC climate-disclosure obligations, and Texas does not require recyclable-material wholesalers to publish environmental performance reports outside of TCEQ permit-specific monitoring submissions [source: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/data].
Analysts and journalists comparing this entity to publicly traded peers should note that the stated-versus-measured frame requires a stated baseline, and for ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY that baseline does not exist in the public record surfaced by the research bundle [source: https://search.brave.com/]. Requests for voluntary disclosure should be directed to the facility operator and to TCEQ Region 12 in Houston, which holds the delegated permit file for Colorado County operations [source: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/directory/region/reg12.html].
Compliance Snapshot (24 months)
| EPA-reported violations | 8 |
|---|---|
| Aggregate penalties | $72.40M |
| Active permits | 0 |
| Latest permit on file | May 19, 2020 |
| Latest inspection | — |
Compliance Overview
The compliance profile for ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY rests on a single ECHO-registered site in Colorado County, Texas, operating under NAICS 42393 — a code covering merchant wholesalers of recyclable materials including metal, paper, plastic, and related secondary commodities [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Eight quarters flagged for noncompliance in the trailing 24 months is the ceiling. Under ECHO's derivation rule (viol_24mo = min(qtrs_with_nc, 8)), that reading indicates the facility drew a citation in every available quarter of the window, not merely most of them [source: https://echo.epa.gov/help/reports/dfr-help]. The environmental justice index average is reported as 0.0, a value that typically reflects either a facility in a low-population census block or incomplete EJSCREEN linkage rather than a substantive finding of zero demographic exposure [source: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen].
A quarter-by-quarter reconstruction of the past 24 months is constrained by the absence of quarter-level detail in the supplied bundle, but the ECHO export's as-of date of 2026-05-04 places the window at approximately Q2 2024 through Q1 2026 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The latest permit action logged in ECHO carries the date 2020-05-19. The active-permit count of zero suggests either lapse, transfer, or administrative continuation under a state-delegated program such as the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System administered by TCEQ [source: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/wastewater]. Under EPA's delegation framework, TCEQ carries primary enforcement authority for CWA NPDES, CAA Title V, and RCRA Subtitle C programs in Texas, and ECHO ingests state-reported data on a lag [source: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-6-south-central].
The derived 24-month penalty total of $72,404,961.60 is a mechanical pro-ration of a five-year total and should not be read as a single adjudicated fine [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. ECHO's documentation states that penalty figures aggregate final assessed penalties from federal judicial consent decrees, federal administrative orders, and state actions where reported, and that supplemental environmental projects and cost recovery are sometimes folded into the aggregate [source: https://echo.epa.gov/help/reports/enforcement-case-report-help]. Without a case-by-case breakdown from ECHO's Integrated Compliance Information System detail pages, the supplied bundle cannot confirm which statutory program — Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act — accounts for the bulk of the reported penalty value [source: https://echo.epa.gov/tools/data-downloads/icis-fec-download-summary]. Analysts should pull the facility-specific Detailed Facility Report for identifier 110067678622 before relying on the $72.4 million figure in any downstream model [source: https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110067678622].
Enforcement Actions
Per-action breakdown at the granularity required for a case-by-case narrative is not present in the supplied research bundle. The ECHO exporter summary reports aggregate counts and totals rather than individual case IDs, docket numbers, or settlement dates [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. What the bundle does confirm: eight quarters of noncompliance and a derived penalty total of $72,404,961.60 across the 24-month window ending 2026-05-04, with no program-level disaggregation between CWA, CAA, or RCRA [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That gap matters. For facility EPA ID 110067678622, analysts seeking case-level detail should query the ICIS-FE&C case download and the facility's Detailed Facility Report, both of which expose enforcement action type, lead agency, statutory authority, penalty assessed, and compliance schedule milestones [source: https://echo.epa.gov/tools/data-downloads/icis-fec-download-summary]. No Brave News results for the 365-day facility window were returned, meaning no contemporaneous media coverage of consent decrees, administrative orders, or notices of violation against ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY is available in this bundle to corroborate or contextualize the ECHO figures [source: https://search.brave.com/]. The zero active-permit count as of the export date, paired with a last permit date of 2020-05-19, is itself a compliance signal worth verification against TCEQ's Central Registry and the EPA Region 6 permit file [source: https://www15.tceq.texas.gov/crpub/].
Active Permits
No active permits on record.
Recent Violations (24 months)
No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.
Per-Facility Breakdown
ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY (EPA ID 110067678622), Altair, Colorado County, Texas — the single ECHO-registered site associated with this entity — accounts for 100% of the reported 24-month violation count of eight quarters and 100% of the derived $72.4 million penalty exposure [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The EJ index average of 0.0 is anomalous. EPA's EJSCREEN methodology produces percentile indices ranging from 0 to 100 across demographic and environmental indicators, and a flat 0.0 typically signals either a rural census block with minimal population or a data-linkage gap between the facility coordinates and the EJSCREEN block-group layer [source: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen/how-interpret-ejscreen-data]. Altair is an unincorporated community in Colorado County with a small residential population, a profile consistent with the low-index reading [source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/coloradocountytexas]. That said, low index values do not rule out exposure risk to nearby agricultural workers or to users of the Colorado River watershed downstream of the site. No secondary facilities were surfaced for this entity in the ECHO export, so the additional per-facility paragraphs that would ordinarily populate this section are not supported by the underlying data. Analysts should treat ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY as a single-site compliance profile rather than a multi-facility portfolio [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Single-site status can be confirmed by searching the ECHO facility search interface by parent company name and by ZIP code 77412 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility-search].
Pollutant Context
The ECHO summary for ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY reports an empty top_pollutants array, meaning the exporter did not associate specific Toxics Release Inventory chemicals, NPDES effluent parameters, or CAA criteria pollutants with this facility at the time of the 2026-05-04 snapshot [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The absence of named pollutants does not mean the site is clean. NAICS 42393 operations — recyclable material merchant wholesalers — commonly handle scrap metal, end-of-life vehicles, electronic waste, and post-consumer plastics, and the pollutant profile typical to the sector includes lead and lead compounds, used oil and petroleum hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls from legacy transformer dielectric fluids, and stormwater discharges carrying total suspended solids and dissolved metals [source: https://www.epa.gov/hw/defining-hazardous-waste-listed-characteristic-and-mixed-radiological-wastes]. Lead exposure pathways are multiple. Inhalation of particulate from shredding and torch-cutting operations, incidental soil ingestion in adjacent residential areas, and surface-water migration via uncontrolled stormwater each represent distinct routes. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System profile for lead documents developmental neurotoxicity at blood lead levels once considered safe [source: https://www.epa.gov/lead/learn-about-lead]. Used oil and petroleum hydrocarbons are regulated under 40 CFR Part 279 and, when mismanaged, contaminate groundwater and surface water with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes — several of which carry IARC Group 1 or 2A carcinogen classifications [source: https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/managing-used-oil-answers-frequent-questions-businesses]. Stormwater discharges from scrap yards fall specifically under EPA's Multi-Sector General Permit Sector N, which sets benchmark monitoring thresholds for aluminum, iron, lead, and zinc. Exceedances of those benchmarks are a common driver of CWA noncompliance findings at NAICS 42393 sites [source: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities-epas-2021-msgp]. Because the ECHO bundle supplied does not name specific pollutants for this facility, the pathway and toxicity discussion above is sector-typical rather than site-confirmed [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Environmental Justice Context
EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.
Average EJScreen index
0
Facility-level EJ data unavailable.
Peer Comparison
The NAICS peer benchmark array supplied in the research bundle is empty, which means no ranked peer set within NAICS 42393 is available for direct penalty or violation comparison in this briefing [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Analysts wishing to construct a peer benchmark can filter the ECHO exporter by NAICS code 42393 and sort by penalty_total_5yr to generate a comparable cohort. Census Bureau NAICS documentation confirms the code's scope covers merchant wholesalers of recyclable materials including ferrous and nonferrous scrap, paper, plastic, and textile waste [source: https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=42393&year=2022]. Without that constructed cohort, the $72.4 million derived 24-month penalty figure for ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY cannot be placed on a percentile curve against its sector in this document [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Forward-Looking Risk Factors
ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY is privately held with no CIK assigned, and no 10-K, 10-Q, or registration-statement filings are available on SEC EDGAR for this entity. Accordingly, no Item 1A forward-looking environmental risk factors can be quoted from the company's own securities disclosures in this briefing [source: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany]. Forward-looking regulatory exposure for NAICS 42393 operators in Texas is shaped by TCEQ enforcement priorities, EPA Region 6 inspection targeting, and the 2021 EPA Multi-Sector General Permit Sector N stormwater benchmarks — each of which remains applicable regardless of private-company status [source: https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities-epas-2021-msgp].
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the source and meaning of the $72.4 million 24-month penalty figure?
The figure is a mechanical pro-ration: ECHO's five-year total penalty value for facility 110067678622 multiplied by 24/60. It is not a single adjudicated fine, and it aggregates federal judicial, federal administrative, and state-reported penalties where available [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Why does the environmental justice index average read 0.0?
EJSCREEN indices range 0 to 100 as percentiles. A flat 0.0 typically indicates a rural census block group with minimal population or a geocoding gap between facility coordinates and the EJSCREEN demographic layer, not a finding of zero exposure [source: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen/how-interpret-ejscreen-data].
Why are there no active permits when the facility is operating?
ECHO reports zero active permits and a last permit date of 2020-05-19. In Texas, NPDES and air permits are administered by TCEQ under EPA delegation, and ECHO ingests state data on a lag; verification against TCEQ's Central Registry is recommended [source: https://www15.tceq.texas.gov/crpub/].
Where can I find case-level detail on the eight quarters of noncompliance?
The ICIS-FE&C download and the facility-specific Detailed Facility Report for EPA ID 110067678622 expose action type, statutory authority, penalty assessed, and compliance milestones [source: https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110067678622].
Does ALTAIR RECYCLING FACILITY publish a sustainability report?
No sustainability report, CDP filing, or ESG disclosure for this entity was returned by the research bundle's SERP queries, and the entity is private with no SEC filings on EDGAR [source: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany].
Sources
- EPA ECHO — exporter bulk download — https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip
- EPA ECHO — Detailed Facility Report (ID 110067678622) — https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110067678622
- EPA ECHO — ICIS-FE&C case download — https://echo.epa.gov/tools/data-downloads/icis-fec-download-summary
- EPA ECHO — facility search — https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility-search
- EPA ECHO — DFR help documentation — https://echo.epa.gov/help/reports/dfr-help
- EPA ECHO — enforcement case report help — https://echo.epa.gov/help/reports/enforcement-case-report-help
- EPA ECHO — search results help — https://echo.epa.gov/help/facility-search/search-results-help
- EPA EJSCREEN — interpretation guide — https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen/how-interpret-ejscreen-data
- EPA EJSCREEN — program page — https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen
- EPA — MSGP 2021 (stormwater industrial) — https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities-epas-2021-msgp
- EPA — lead program reference — https://www.epa.gov/lead/learn-about-lead
- EPA — used oil management (40 CFR Part 279) — https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/managing-used-oil-answers-frequent-questions-businesses
- EPA — hazardous waste definitions — https://www.epa.gov/hw/defining-hazardous-waste-listed-characteristic-and-mixed-radiological-wastes
- EPA Region 6 — delegation and oversight — https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-6-south-central
- TCEQ — wastewater permitting — https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/wastewater
- TCEQ — Central Registry public search — https://www15.tceq.texas.gov/crpub/
- TCEQ — Region 12 Houston office — https://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/directory/region/reg12.html
- TCEQ — agency data portal — https://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/data
- SEC EDGAR — company search — https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany
- U.S. Census Bureau — NAICS 42393 definition — https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=42393&year=2022
- U.S. Census Bureau — Colorado County TX QuickFacts — https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/coloradocountytexas
- Brave Search — SERP source — https://search.brave.com/
Similar companies
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA · 190 violations · $528.49M penalties
EES COKE BATTERY L.L.C. (P0408)
MI · 8 violations · $40.29M penalties
GREKA BELL COMPRESSOR PLANT
Crude Petroleum Extraction
CA · 0 violations · $26.16M penalties
VERIS GOLD JERRITT CANYON MINE
NV · 1 violation · $24.42M penalties
UPS
CA · 43 violations · $22.12M penalties
Related WME analysis
May 13, 2026
How Clean Air Act Section 114 letters surface before formal EPA violations
A practical guide to reading EPA Section 114 information requests: how to tell a rulemaking letter from an enforcement letter, what the 30-day clock means, and why the response itself becomes evidence.
May 11, 2026
How to weight ESG limitations callouts in a vendor decision
A tiered methodology for assigning weight to ESG limitations across vendors, calibrated to CS3D value-chain scope and EU AML predicate-offence exposure.
May 8, 2026
How to find a supplier's last 5 RCRA hazardous-waste violations in 15 minutes
A reproducible workflow for pulling a supplier's most recent RCRA enforcement actions from EPA ECHO, benchmarking penalty exposure, and cross-checking state agency records.
