BOBCAT STATE PRODUCTION FACILITY

Bobcat State Production Facility (EPA Registry ID 110062494242) is a single-site oil and gas extraction operation in Pecos, Texas, classified under NAICS 211111. EPA ECHO records as of 04 May 2026 show zero formal quarters with noncompliance flagged over the trailing 24 months, zero active permits listed in the current ECHO extract, and a derived penalty total of $7.71 million apportioned from a five-year aggregate using the ECHO exporter methodology (viol_24mo=min(qtrs_with_nc,8); penalty_24mo=total_5yr*(24/60)) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. EJ index averages return 0.0 in the current extract, and the ECHO data bundle lists no top-reported pollutants for the site [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The name overlap with Doosan Bobcat — the compact equipment manufacturer headquartered in North Dakota — is a persistent source of retrieval noise. News coverage over the past 30 days pertaining to 'Bobcat' is dominated by Caterpillar v. Doosan Bobcat patent litigation [source: https://thedailyrecord.com/2026/04/08/caterpillar-bobcat-sue-each-other-over-patent-infringement] and an unrelated employment matter in Wahpeton, ND [source: https://kfyrtv.com/2026/04/23/bobcat-denies-discrimination-claims-federal-lawsuit]. Neither item touches the Pecos upstream facility covered here. No sustainability report, 10-K, or 10-Q is on file for the Pecos operator; the entity is identified as private with no CIK. Peer benchmarking within NAICS 2111xx places the facility's $7.71M derived penalty total well below Greka Bell Compressor Plant ($26.16M), Red Hills Gas Processing Plant ($19.13M), and Azalea Battery ($16.13M) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That gap matters. Two of those three peers carry the maximum eight flagged noncompliance quarters in the ECHO window, while Bobcat State shows zero — a pattern suggesting the allocated dollar figure traces to legacy enforcement activity rather than anything adjudicated in the current 24-month period.

The ECHO exporter extract dated 04 May 2026 returns a single Facility Registry System record tied to Bobcat State Production Facility, registry ID 110062494242, located in Pecos, Reeves County, Texas [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The FRS detail endpoint is the authoritative EPA-side index for cross-program linkage across CAA, CWA, RCRA, and SDWIS [source: https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110001505354]. In the current bundle, the derived violation_count_24mo is 0, meaning the ECHO quarterly noncompliance flag was not raised in any of the eight trailing quarters captured by the exporter snapshot [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The 24-month window running May 2024 through April 2026 contains no discrete enforcement milestones in the ECHO extract for this facility. The $7.71 million figure carried in the penalty_total_24mo field is not tied to a single adjudicated action in the exporter data. It is a straight-line apportionment of a five-year penalty aggregate, calculated as total_5yr multiplied by 24/60 per the documented derivation [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Analysts should treat that figure as an accounting allocation rather than a fresh 24-month adjudication, absent a matching Consent Decree, Administrative Order, or EPA case docket that a separate ECHO case-level query would confirm. No such case documentation appears in the provided research bundle.

Outside the ECHO dataset, no Texas Commission on Environmental Quality press releases, no Department of Justice announcements, and no NGO complaints targeting the Pecos facility surface in the 365-day news window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Brave SERP queries for state violations and NGO or litigation activity returned empty result sets. The only Texas-situated news item tangentially related to upstream or extraction infrastructure in the window concerns a USDA sterile fly production facility in Edinburg — unrelated to this operator [source: https://hpj.com/2026/04/18/officials-break-ground-on-new-texas-sterile-fly-production-facility]. An OSHRC decision involving Bobcat Contracting, LLC — a Texas-based contractor — is a distinct legal entity and should not be attributed to the Pecos production facility [source: https://www.oshrc.gov/wp-content/uploads/ALJ-Decision-22-0067-Bobcat-Contracting-LLC-Redacted.html]. A separate Delaware Superior Court matter captioned Bobcat North America, LLC v. Inland Waste Holdings, LLC involves the equipment manufacturer affiliate, not the Pecos upstream site [source: https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/superior-court/2020/n17c-06-170-prw-ccld-0.html].

No per-action enforcement docket entries are present in the research bundle for Bobcat State Production Facility (FRS 110062494242) across the 24-month window running May 2024 through April 2026. The ECHO exporter returns violation_count_24mo = 0 and an allocated penalty_total_24mo of $7,710,000, derived by multiplying a five-year aggregate by 0.4 rather than tied to a discrete CWA, CAA, or RCRA adjudication visible in the extract [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Active permit count in the current snapshot is 0 and latest_permit_date is blank. That combination typically indicates either a records-matching gap in the FRS cross-program linkage or a facility operating under a state-issued TCEQ air authorization not yet reflected in the federal ECHO roll-up [source: https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110001505354]. No Consent Decree, no Administrative Penalty Order, no Notice of Violation, and no Section 309 civil referral is documented in the provided materials. Pending confirmation from a case-level ECHO query or a TCEQ enforcement docket pull, the $7.71M figure should be read as a modeled allocation rather than a confirmed 24-month cash penalty [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The distinction is not trivial: a confirmed adjudication would appear in EPA's ICIS-Air or ICIS-NPDES case tables with a docket number, settlement date, and named respondent — none of which are present here.

Bobcat State Production Facility, Pecos, TX (FRS 110062494242) — single-site operator in Reeves County, within the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian. ECHO returns facility_count = 1, violation_count_24mo = 0, ej_index_avg = 0.0, and active_permits_count = 0 in the 04 May 2026 extract [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The top_pollutants array is empty, meaning TRI or DMR-reported pollutant rankings are either not filed under this registry ID or not joined into the exporter slice. The FRS detail interface is the primary cross-program verification path for program linkage [source: https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110001505354].

Because the ECHO bundle returns a facility count of one, the remaining four 'top facilities' customarily populated in this section are not applicable. The operator does not appear in the research bundle with additional subsidiary sites. Readers seeking a multi-site footprint should not conflate this upstream Texas site with Doosan Bobcat's manufacturing network in Statesville, North Carolina — a plant that completed a major expansion in October 2022 [source: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221011006208/en/Bobcat-Company-Celebrates-Completion-of-Manufacturing-Facility-Expansion-in-Statesville-N.C.] — or with Bobcat Contracting, LLC, the Texas contractor that is a distinct legal entity [source: https://www.oshrc.gov/wp-content/uploads/ALJ-Decision-22-0067-Bobcat-Contracting-LLC-Redacted.html]. The shared brand name creates genuine retrieval ambiguity. Each entity carries its own regulatory history, and attribution errors in either direction would misrepresent the compliance record.

The ECHO extract reports an empty top_pollutants array for FRS 110062494242, and no TRI Form R or DMR-reported release values are supplied in the research bundle [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That absence of facility-specific data is the finding. A sector-typical profile for NAICS 211111 crude petroleum extraction in the Permian Basin would ordinarily include fugitive methane, volatile organic compounds — benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes associated with produced gas and flash emissions — hydrogen sulfide at sour sites, and produced-water constituents regulated under CWA Subchapter IV oil and gas effluent guidelines. None of those are attributed to the Pecos facility in the provided data. Stating otherwise would be a sector inference, not a facility finding, and the two should not be conflated. The FRS detail page is the correct starting point for program-specific pollutant queries [source: https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110001505354].

Environmental justice exposure pathways in Reeves County typically involve airshed dispersion from compressor and tank-battery emissions to nearby residential receptors. The ej_index_avg value in the current extract is 0.0, which may indicate either low modeled EJScreen percentile scores at the site's coordinates or a missing join in the exporter slice [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. A direct EJScreen query against the facility's latitude and longitude coordinates would resolve that ambiguity and should be treated as a necessary verification step before drawing any conclusions about community exposure at this location.

Within the NAICS 2111xx peer set captured by the ECHO exporter, Bobcat State Production Facility's derived 24-month penalty figure of $7.71M sits materially below the three top-penalty peers: Greka Bell Compressor Plant at $26.16M with zero flagged violation quarters, Red Hills Gas Processing Plant at $19.13M with eight flagged violation quarters, and Azalea Battery at $16.13M also carrying eight flagged quarters [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The pattern is worth noting. Two of the three peers reached the maximum ECHO-window count of eight noncompliance quarters while Bobcat State shows zero, which suggests the facility's allocated penalty figure traces to legacy enforcement actions rather than a current-window enforcement cadence [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Greka Bell's $26.16M figure alongside a zero violation count mirrors the same derivation dynamic seen at the Pecos site — a large allocated dollar amount disconnected from recent quarterly flags. Analysts should apply consistent methodological caution across all four facilities when comparing these figures.

No SEC 10-K Item 1A content is available for Bobcat State Production Facility; the entity is identified as private with no CIK in the research bundle, and the 10-K and 10-Q fields in the source set are empty [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Forward-looking environmental risk disclosures that would ordinarily appear in an Item 1A section — including methane rule exposure under CAA Subpart OOOOb and OOOOc, produced-water handling obligations under CWA, and state-level TCEQ permit conditions — are not on file in the provided materials. Those regulatory frameworks carry real financial exposure for Permian Basin operators. CAA Subpart OOOOb, finalized in December 2023, imposes equipment-level monitoring and repair requirements that affect tank batteries and compressor stations of the type common to NAICS 211111 sites. Analysts requiring forward-looking language should query TCEQ permit dockets directly and, for any affiliated public parent, consult SEC EDGAR. Neither path is populated in the current bundle, leaving the forward risk profile unresolved.