This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 11, 2026. If you represent HOWELL D353S/HOWELL D4A TWINNED LOCATION, you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.
No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.
ESG & Compliance Snapshot
HOWELL D353S/HOWELL D4A TWINNED LOCATION
Last updated May 11, 2026
Located in San Juan County · New Mexico
Executive Summary
Howell D353S/Howell D4A Twinned Location is a single-site natural gas extraction operation classified under NAICS 211130 and headquartered in Aztec, New Mexico, registered in EPA's Facility Registry under ID 110043976105 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. ECHO's quarterly compliance derivation returns zero formally coded violations in the trailing 24 months. It also assigns an apportioned penalty figure of $3,760,000, calculated as total_5yr*(24/60) per the exporter methodology note — a pro-rata estimate, not a booked settlement [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The facility carries no active federal permits of record in the snapshot dated 2026-05-04. ECHO returns a null environmental justice index and an empty top-pollutants array, which reflects either sub-threshold reporting or gaps in the cross-program linkage rather than an affirmative finding of zero exposure [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
The operator is privately held. No CIK is registered with the SEC, and no 10-K or 10-Q filings are available for Item 1A or MD&A review. Peer benchmarking within NAICS 211120/211130 places the apportioned penalty figure well below the top three regional peers: Greka Bell Compressor Plant at $26.16M, Red Hills Gas Processing Plant at $19.13M across two facilities with eight quarters of non-compliance, and HP Gas Pad at $16.13M with eight quarters of non-compliance [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No sustainability report, NGO complaint, state-court filing, or media coverage tied to this specific twinned wellsite surfaced in the research bundle across the 365-day window. Readers should treat the penalty apportionment as an accounting artifact pending direct review of the underlying ECHO facility detail page.
Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)
What they say vs what EPA shows
No sustainability report, CDP disclosure, TCFD filing, GRI index, or voluntary ESG statement attributable to the operator of Howell D353S/Howell D4A Twinned Location appears in the research bundle. Brave SERP queries targeting sustainability disclosure returned an empty result set. Exa neural-search for sustainability reports and ESG disclosures surfaced four items, none attributable to this operator: a DitchCarbon emissions estimate page for Howell Metal Company [source: https://ditchcarbon.com/organizations/howell-metal-company]; the Howmet Aerospace 2023 Environmental, Social and Governance Report [source: https://www.howmet.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/04/2023-Environmental-Social-and-Governance-Report_FINAL.pdf]; a sustainability page for Howorth Air Technology Limited [source: https://howorthgroup.com/sustainability]; and a Township of Howell, New Jersey affordable-housing resolution [source: https://www.twp.howell.nj.us/DocumentCenter/View/11565/R-25-69-RESO-W-BACKUP-Rejecting-DCA-Round-4-Obligation-Howell]. None concern the San Juan Basin gas wellsite. The name-collision problem is consistent across every search channel.
The stated-versus-measured analysis therefore cannot be populated with paired quotes. The measured side consists of one data row: facility_count 1, violation_count_24mo 0, penalty_total_24mo $3,760,000 apportioned, active_permits_count 0, ej_index_avg 0.0 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The stated side is empty. Readers evaluating this operator for ESG screening should treat the absence of voluntary disclosure as a material information gap. No CIK registration means SEC filings cannot backfill that gap, and no Brave or Exa news hit places the operator in a published sustainability framework within the 365-day window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
The $3.76M apportioned penalty warrants direct verification against the ECHO facility detail page before incorporation into any screening score. The exporter methodology scales a five-year total to 24 months mathematically rather than extracting dated settlements, which means the figure could overstate or understate actual cash outlays within the window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Compliance Snapshot (24 months)
| EPA-reported violations | 0 |
|---|---|
| Aggregate penalties | $3.76M |
| Active permits | 0 |
| Latest permit on file | — |
| Latest inspection | — |
Compliance Overview
The compliance posture of Howell D353S/Howell D4A rests almost entirely on a single federal data artifact: the EPA ECHO Exporter snapshot dated 2026-05-04T17:08:05Z [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That snapshot records one facility under registry ID 110043976105, zero quarters of formal non-compliance in the trailing 24 months, zero active permits, and an apportioned monetized penalty of $3.76 million derived from a five-year total scaled to a 24-month window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The derivation formula — penalty_24mo = total_5yr*(24/60) — is disclosed in the exporter metadata. It signals a pro-rata estimate rather than a booked settlement amount specific to the 24-month window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
A chronological narrative of the past 24 months cannot be reconstructed from public news sources. Brave SERP queries for sustainability reports, NGO litigation surfaces, and state-level violations returned null result sets. Brave news queries tied to the company name and to facility and state scope in the 30-day and 365-day windows returned only unrelated hits — Elden Ring weapon guides, Diablo 4 endgame content, a Bengals NFL draft pick named Cashius Howell, a Howell County (Missouri) sheriff's office announcement, and an obituary for Norvil Howell of Clovis, New Mexico [source: https://www.ozarkradionews.com/local-news/howell-county-sheriffs-office-introduces-new-crisis-intervention-specialist] [source: https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/easternnewmexiconews/name/norvil-howell-obituary?id=61316842]. None of those items reference the twinned wellsite, its operator, or natural gas extraction activity in San Juan County, New Mexico.
Exa neural-search for court records and EPA enforcement returned three items. The first is a 1974 Illinois Pollution Control Board matter against The Howell Company, a division of Interlake, Inc., regarding a furniture plant in Saint Charles, Illinois [source: https://pcb.illinois.gov/documents/dsweb/Get/Rendition-143353/unknown]. The second is a closed RCRA administrative docket against DMI Automotive Inc. in Howell, Michigan — Docket RCRA-05-2011-0002, complaint filed 2010-11-03, closed 2011-05-23 [source: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/rhc/EPAAdmin.nsf/272e29b668830d488525756200700fa7/bd81fedfe6fa515e852577d1001b7daa!OpenDocument]. The third is an Indiana IDEM agreed order against Honeywell International [source: https://www.in.gov/idem/oe/cause/AO/14638-H.htm]. None of the three match the New Mexico twinned wellsite. The practical consequence is that the compliance record for Howell D353S/Howell D4A within the bundle is limited to a single ECHO row, and any narrative beyond that row requires direct retrieval from the ECHO facility detail page or from New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau records [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Enforcement Actions
No discrete enforcement actions with program designation, docket number, complaint date, or settlement amount are available in the research bundle for facility ID 110043976105. ECHO records zero quarters of non-compliance across CWA, CAA, and RCRA program flags in the 24-month window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $3,760,000 figure carried in penalty_total_24mo is a derived value — 40% of a five-year total — and its underlying booked settlements, consent decrees, or administrative orders are not itemized in the exporter feed [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
The three enforcement matters returned by Exa neural-search concern unrelated entities entirely. Docket PCB 73-344 before the Illinois Pollution Control Board names The Howell Company for emissions at a furniture manufacturing plant in Saint Charles, Illinois — a 1974 proceeding with no geographic or operational connection to San Juan County [source: https://pcb.illinois.gov/documents/dsweb/Get/Rendition-143353/unknown]. EPA Region 5's RCRA administrative case against DMI Automotive Inc. in Howell, Michigan, Docket RCRA-05-2011-0002, was filed on 2010-11-03 and closed on 2011-05-23 with disposition Payment Received [source: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/rhc/EPAAdmin.nsf/272e29b668830d488525756200700fa7/bd81fedfe6fa515e852577d1001b7daa!OpenDocument]. Indiana IDEM Case No. 2005-14638-H names Honeywell International, not any New Mexico gas extraction operator [source: https://www.in.gov/idem/oe/cause/AO/14638-H.htm]. None can be attributed to the San Juan County natural gas wellsite. Analysts requiring action-level detail should pull the ECHO facility detail URL for FRS 110043976105 directly and cross-reference against New Mexico OCD (Oil Conservation Division) and NMED Air Quality Bureau compliance trackers [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Active Permits
No active permits on record.
Recent Violations (24 months)
No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.
Per-Facility Breakdown
Howell D353S/Howell D4A Twinned Location, Aztec, New Mexico (FRS 110043976105): the ECHO exporter returns a single facility row under this operator slug with zero formal quarters of non-compliance, zero active permits of record in the snapshot, an EJ index reported as 0.0, and an empty top_pollutants array [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $3.76M apportioned penalty is the only monetized data point available. The twinned designation in the facility name suggests two co-located wellheads operating under a single FRS identifier — a common convention for San Juan Basin operations where adjacent wellheads share surface infrastructure. No second, third, fourth, or fifth facility is registered under this operator slug in the bundle; the facility_count field is 1 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Regional air-quality context for the San Juan Basin is established — though not specific to this operator — by the NMED-filed Four-Factor Analysis for the Mountainair Compressor Station operated by Transwestern Pipeline Company. That document addresses Regional Haze Rule obligations under 40 CFR §51.300-309 within the same state [source: https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/12/AI_1569_11203587-RPT-Mountainair_Four-Factor_FINAL.pdf]. The Mountainair analysis does not name the Howell twinned site. It does establish the regulatory framework that would apply to any material emission source of similar class in New Mexico, making it a useful structural reference for evaluating what compliance obligations could attach to this wellsite if emissions cross reporting thresholds.
Pollutant Context
ECHO returns an empty top_pollutants array for FRS 110043976105, and no TRI, NEI, or AQS emissions figures are attached in the bundle [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That data gap does not mean the site emits nothing. For NAICS 211130 natural gas extraction operations in the San Juan Basin, the default pollutant profile of regulatory concern centers on methane (CH4), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) — all governed under the Clean Air Act as administered by NMED. The Mountainair Compressor Station Four-Factor Analysis filed with NMED describes the applicable framework in detail: 40 CFR §§51.300 to 51.309 govern visibility-impairing emissions, with NOx and SO2 as the principal regulated species for the Regional Haze Second Planning Period [source: https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/12/AI_1569_11203587-RPT-Mountainair_Four-Factor_FINAL.pdf].
Exposure pathways for upstream gas extraction sites of this type typically include fugitive well-pad emissions, pneumatic controller venting, and flaring events. Each pathway carries distinct monitoring and reporting obligations under federal and state rules. Environmental justice implications in the Four Corners region attach to proximity to Navajo Nation allotments and lower-income rural populations — a geographic reality that makes the EJ index figure here worth scrutinizing. The EJ index of 0.0 returned by ECHO for this specific FRS should be read as an absence of coded data in the snapshot rather than an affirmative finding of no exposure concern [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Direct TRI and NEI pulls would be required to populate a pollutant-specific profile for this site.
Environmental Justice Context
EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.
Average EJScreen index
0
Facility-level EJ data unavailable.
Peer Comparison
| Peer | Violations (24mo) | Penalties (24mo) |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
| — | — | — |
| — | — | — |
Within the NAICS 211120/211130 peer set pulled from the exporter, Howell D353S/Howell D4A's apportioned penalty of $3.76M is roughly one-seventh of Greka Bell Compressor Plant's $26.16M, one-fifth of Red Hills Gas Processing Plant's $19.13M spread across two facilities and eight quarters of non-compliance, and less than one-quarter of HP Gas Pad's $16.13M across one facility and eight quarters [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The penalty gap is substantial. Unlike Red Hills and HP Gas Pad, the Howell site records zero quarters of non-compliance in the 24-month window, matching Greka Bell's zero-quarter figure despite carrying a penalty total that is a fraction of Greka Bell's. All four peers return a 0.0 EJ index in the exporter, which reflects snapshot limitations rather than comparative EJ positioning [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Forward-Looking Risk Factors
No SEC 10-K Item 1A risk factor disclosure is available for this operator. The entity is privately held with no CIK, and the research bundle contains empty dictionaries for 10-K and 10-Q excerpts [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Forward-looking environmental risk at the facility level would ordinarily attach to Regional Haze Second Planning Period obligations under 40 CFR §51.300-309 as administered by NMED Air Quality Bureau — a framework documented in the Transwestern Pipeline Mountainair Compressor Station four-factor analysis [source: https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/12/AI_1569_11203587-RPT-Mountainair_Four-Factor_FINAL.pdf] — and to federal methane rule amendments applicable to NAICS 211130 upstream operators. Those methane rules have tightened since 2022 and carry direct implications for well-pad venting and pneumatic controller configurations of the type common to San Juan Basin sites. Direct Item 1A text for this specific operator is not in the record, and no proxy disclosure from a comparable private operator was located in the bundle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Howell D353S/Howell D4A have any recorded EPA violations in the past 24 months?
ECHO records zero quarters of formal non-compliance for facility ID 110043976105 across the 24-month window ending 2026-05-04 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
What is the $3.76M penalty figure, and was it actually paid in the past 24 months?
The figure is an apportioned estimate derived by the exporter using the formula penalty_24mo = total_5yr*(24/60), which scales a five-year penalty total to a 24-month window mathematically rather than extracting dated settlement amounts [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Whether a cash payment occurred inside the 24-month window requires direct ECHO facility-detail review.
Is the operator publicly traded?
No. The ticker field is marked private and no CIK is registered, meaning no 10-K, 10-Q, or SEC environmental disclosure is available [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Are the EPA enforcement results from Exa about this operator?
No. The three enforcement items returned — the 1974 Illinois PCB action against The Howell Company furniture plant [source: https://pcb.illinois.gov/documents/dsweb/Get/Rendition-143353/unknown], the 2010-2011 EPA Region 5 RCRA case against DMI Automotive in Howell, Michigan [source: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/rhc/EPAAdmin.nsf/272e29b668830d488525756200700fa7/bd81fedfe6fa515e852577d1001b7daa!OpenDocument], and the Indiana IDEM case against Honeywell International [source: https://www.in.gov/idem/oe/cause/AO/14638-H.htm] — concern unrelated entities.
Why does the ECHO EJ index read 0.0?
The exporter returns ej_index_avg 0.0 and an empty top_pollutants array for this FRS, which typically reflects absent or unjoined EJScreen linkage in the snapshot rather than an affirmative finding that no EJ-relevant populations are proximate to the site [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Sources
- EPA ECHO Exporter — facility snapshot (FRS 110043976105) — https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip
- Illinois Pollution Control Board — PCB 73-344, EPA v. The Howell Company (1974) — https://pcb.illinois.gov/documents/dsweb/Get/Rendition-143353/unknown
- EPA Administrative Enforcement Dockets — DMI Automotive Inc., RCRA-05-2011-0002 — https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/rhc/EPAAdmin.nsf/272e29b668830d488525756200700fa7/bd81fedfe6fa515e852577d1001b7daa!OpenDocument
- Indiana IDEM — Agreed Order 2005-14638-H, Honeywell International — https://www.in.gov/idem/oe/cause/AO/14638-H.htm
- NMED Air Quality Bureau — Transwestern Mountainair Compressor Station Four-Factor Analysis — https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/12/AI_1569_11203587-RPT-Mountainair_Four-Factor_FINAL.pdf
- EPA SEMS — Eagle Picher Carefree Battery Superfund Proposed Plan (NM regional context) — https://semspub.epa.gov/work/06/706792.pdf
- NMED — HollyFrontier Facility Description (NM regional context) — https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/03/01_Attachment-A-Facility-Description-04-28-2017.pdf
- DitchCarbon — Howell Metal Company emissions profile (unrelated entity, disambiguation) — https://ditchcarbon.com/organizations/howell-metal-company
- Howmet Aerospace 2023 ESG Report (unrelated entity, disambiguation) — https://www.howmet.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2024/04/2023-Environmental-Social-and-Governance-Report_FINAL.pdf
- Ozark Radio News — Howell County Sheriff's Office announcement (name-collision context) — https://www.ozarkradionews.com/local-news/howell-county-sheriffs-office-introduces-new-crisis-intervention-specialist
- Legacy.com — Norvil Howell obituary, Clovis NM (name-collision context) — https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/easternnewmexiconews/name/norvil-howell-obituary?id=61316842
Similar companies
RED HILLS GAS PROCESSING PLANT
Natural Gas Extraction
NM · 8 violations · $19.13M penalties
ARTESIA GAS PLANT
Natural Gas Extraction
NM · 8 violations · $13.40M penalties
ZIA II GAS PLANT
Natural Gas Extraction
NM · 1 violation · $12.64M penalties
BURTON FLATS COMPRESSOR STATION
Natural Gas Extraction
NM · 7 violations · $12.64M penalties
SHUGART BOOSTER STATION
Natural Gas Extraction
NM · 1 violation · $12.64M penalties
