HUERFANITO 151/10 TWINNED PRODUCTION LOC

Huerfanito 151/10 Twinned Production Loc is a single-facility natural gas extraction site classified under NAICS 211130, sited in the Huerfano/San Juan County region of northwestern New Mexico. The well pad operates within the broader Huerfanito property footprint, which has produced 112,673,047 MCF of gas and 537,498 barrels of oil across 191 wells between January 1993 and February 2026 [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302]. That three-decade production record sets the scale against which every compliance figure in this briefing should be read.

EPA ECHO records, drawn from the May 4, 2026 exporter snapshot, list facility ID 110056290026 with zero quarters of non-compliance across the trailing 24 months. A derived penalty total of $3,760,000 is also on file, allocated from a five-year enforcement history using the 24/60 proration method the exporter documents explicitly [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No active permits appear in the ECHO snapshot, and the top-pollutants field is empty, leaving that seven-figure enforcement allocation as the only materially quantified signal in the federal record [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The operator is privately held. No SEC CIK exists, no 10-K or 10-Q sits in EDGAR, and no corporate sustainability report surfaced through open-web or Exa neural searches [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That means the standard equity-analyst disclosure vectors — Item 1A risk factors, Item 7 MD&A environmental contingencies — are simply not available. Peer benchmarking within NAICS 211120/211130 places Huerfanito materially below the penalty profile of Greka Bell Compressor Plant ($26.16 million, 24-month derived) and Red Hills Gas Processing Plant ($19.13 million, eight quarters of non-compliance), while landing in the same enforcement tier as other San Juan Basin and Permian gas infrastructure [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Production continued through the review window: February 2026 alone recorded 147,974 MCF of gas [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302].

The 24-month compliance picture for Huerfanito 151/10 Twinned Production Loc rests on a narrow federal evidentiary base. ECHO's exporter dataset, refreshed May 4, 2026, shows facility ID 110056290026 with zero quarters of non-compliance in the trailing eight-quarter window. Under ECHO's own derivation formula — viol_24mo = min(qtrs_with_nc, 8) — that resolves to a violation count of zero [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The derived penalty figure of $3.76 million is not a new fine. It is the 24/60 proration of total five-year penalties attributed to the facility, meaning the underlying enforcement events predate the trailing 24-month window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Running the clock forward from Q2 2024 through Q1 2026: no quarter registered a formal non-compliance designation in ECHO's Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, or RCRA modules for facility 110056290026 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No active permits appear in the ECHO snapshot, and the latest_permit_date field is empty. For an upstream gas production location, that gap typically indicates permitting authority resides with the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division and the New Mexico Environment Department rather than with a federal NPDES or Title V instrument held directly by the well pad [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. State-level violation surfacing returned no Brave SERP hits for this operator. Exa neural searches directed at court records and NGO complaints returned only unrelated EPA administrative decisions — Burtin Urethane, Houston Refining, Paulsboro Refining — with no nexus to Huerfanito [source: https://yosemite.epa.gov/oarm/alj/alj_web_docket.nsf/All%20Dockets%20by%20Statute/8FD51879F4B61ED385257FBC00702478/$File/EPCRA-09-97-0009_BurtinUrethane_98-09-16_InitialDecision_Charneski.pdf] [source: https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2015-10/documents/houstonrefininglp8183.pdf].

Production continuity through the 24-month period is documented in independent data. The Huerfanito property reported 147,974 MCF of gas and 1,056 barrels of oil in February 2026, confirming the site remained operational through the compliance review window [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302]. The cumulative production base — 191 wells, 112.67 million MCF lifetime — establishes the scale at which the $3.76 million derived penalty figure should be read. On a unit-penalty basis, that equates to roughly $0.033 per MCF of lifetime gas, a figure within the San Juan Basin range but below the per-unit enforcement profile of the Permian peers surfaced in the benchmark set [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302] [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. One procedural data point rounds out the regional picture: the New Mexico Environmental Law Center's account of the Albuquerque Air Quality Board upholding a contested permit shows that New Mexico air boards have historically affirmed permits even when community challenges were filed, a backdrop relevant to any future enforcement trajectory at San Juan Basin production locations [source: https://nmelc.org/2017/04/14/albuquerque-air-quality-board-upholds-polluting-permit/].

No discrete enforcement actions against Huerfanito 151/10 Twinned Production Loc appear in the retrieved research bundle for the trailing 24 months. ECHO records zero quarters of non-compliance under the viol_24mo derivation applied to facility 110056290026 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $3,760,000 penalty figure is a mathematical proration of a five-year total, not a discrete 24-month penalty event. ECHO's published derivation is explicit: penalty_24mo = total_5yr × (24/60) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Without the underlying case-level detail — which would require an ECHO detailed facility report or an FOIA-responsive enforcement docket — program attribution across CAA, CWA, and RCRA cannot be stated.

Exa neural-search results returned EPA administrative decisions for three unrelated respondents. First, Burtin Urethane Corporation under EPCRA Docket 09-97-0009, with an initial decision issued September 16, 1998 [source: https://yosemite.epa.gov/oarm/alj/alj_web_docket.nsf/All%20Dockets%20by%20Statute/8FD51879F4B61ED385257FBC00702478/$File/EPCRA-09-97-0009_BurtinUrethane_98-09-16_InitialDecision_Charneski.pdf]. Second, Houston Refining LP under CAA Administrative Settlement Agreement AED/MSEB #8183 [source: https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2015-10/documents/houstonrefininglp8183.pdf]. Third, Paulsboro Refining Company LLC — together with PBF Holding, Delaware City Refining, and Toledo Refining — under AED/MSEB #8102, dated July 25, 2014 [source: https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2015-04/documents/paulsbororefiningco8102.pdf]. None of these dockets name Huerfanito or any parent entity linked to the San Juan County well pad. No CourtListener or PACER civil matters were returned. No state OCD or NMED enforcement orders were surfaced by Brave SERP targeting state violations.

The data-quality takeaway is direct: the $3.76 million figure is real as a derivation but opaque as to underlying statute, vintage, and settlement structure. Analysts seeking case-level resolution should pull the ECHO detailed facility report for registry ID 110056290026 directly [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Huerfanito 151/10 Twinned Production Loc — Facility ID 110056290026, San Juan County, New Mexico — is the single facility associated with this entity in the ECHO snapshot. It sits within the broader Huerfanito property, which spans 191 wells and has produced 112,673,047 MCF of natural gas and 537,498 barrels of oil since January 1993, with production continuing through February 2026 at a recent rate of 147,974 MCF per month [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302]. ECHO reports zero 24-month violations, zero active federal permits, and an EJ index average of 0.0. That last figure reflects the absence of recorded EJScreen data rather than a measured low-exposure finding [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

No additional facilities are associated with this operator in the ECHO exporter. The facility_count field is 1, and facility_ids resolves to the single registry identifier 110056290026 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Per-facility ranking by EJ exposure or violation count is therefore non-applicable: the population is one.

ShaleXP property-level data values the Huerfanito property at between $510,708 (ShaleAssessment) and $967,314 (MarketMultiple) on a decimal-interest basis, placing the well pad in the lower-middle tier of San Juan Basin gas assets by valuation [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/huerfanito/884302]. The regional regulatory backdrop is shaped by New Mexico air-quality permitting practice. The New Mexico Environmental Law Center's 2017 account of the Albuquerque Air Quality Board upholding a contested permit illustrates the procedural threshold community challengers face when contesting extraction-adjacent air permits in New Mexico [source: https://nmelc.org/2017/04/14/albuquerque-air-quality-board-upholds-polluting-permit/]. No additional facilities or co-located assets were identified for this operator.

ECHO's top_pollutants field for facility 110056290026 is empty. No TRI, NEI, or DMR-reported pollutant tonnages were attached to this specific facility in the May 4, 2026 exporter snapshot [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. For NAICS 211130 natural gas extraction sites in the San Juan Basin, the pollutant profile is typically driven by methane (CH4) fugitive emissions, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from on-site combustion equipment. None of these are affirmatively reported for this facility in the retrieved data and should not be attributed without source-level confirmation [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The closest regional pollutant-context data point in the retrieved set comes from a different corner of New Mexico entirely. The Socorro Superfund community record documents a groundwater plume at the Eagle Picher Carefree Battery site in Socorro, New Mexico, carrying trichloroethylene (TCE), 1,4-dioxane, 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), and tetrachloroethene (PCE) [source: https://socorrosuperfund.wordpress.com/]. Those are industrial-solvent legacy contaminants. They are not associated with upstream gas extraction and are included here only to frame the New Mexico groundwater-contamination regulatory context in which San Juan Basin operations sit, not to attribute any such chemicals to Huerfanito 151/10 [source: https://socorrosuperfund.wordpress.com/].

Environmental justice exposure for Huerfanito 151/10 cannot be characterized from the retrieved data. ECHO reports ej_index_avg of 0.0, which in the exporter dataset signals a null or unreported value rather than a measured baseline [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. San Juan County, New Mexico includes significant Navajo Nation territory and communities with documented exposure concerns related to oil and gas infrastructure, but no EJScreen-derived percentile values for this specific facility were returned in the research bundle [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Within the NAICS 211120/211130 peer set retrieved from the ECHO exporter, Huerfanito 151/10's derived $3.76 million 24-month penalty figure sits approximately one order of magnitude below the top three peers by penalty total: Greka Bell Compressor Plant at $26.16 million (zero 24-month violations, single facility), Red Hills Gas Processing Plant at $19.13 million (eight quarters of non-compliance, two facilities), and HP Gas Pad at $16.13 million (eight quarters of non-compliance, single facility) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Huerfanito most closely resembles Greka Bell in pattern — a high derived penalty paired with zero trailing 24-month quarters of non-compliance — which points to enforcement weight concentrated in older events within the five-year proration window rather than in recent quarter-level designations [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. None of the peers report non-zero EJ index averages or active federal permits in the exporter snapshot [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

No SEC 10-K is on file for Huerfanito 151/10 Twinned Production Loc. The entity is privately held with no CIK and no Item 1A risk factor disclosure available in EDGAR [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Forward-looking environmental risk for San Juan Basin gas production locations is typically shaped by New Mexico Oil Conservation Division methane rules, federal BLM venting and flaring requirements on split-estate and federal lands, and the procedural posture of state air-quality boards as documented in the 2017 Albuquerque Air Quality Board permit affirmance covered by the New Mexico Environmental Law Center [source: https://nmelc.org/2017/04/14/albuquerque-air-quality-board-upholds-polluting-permit/]. Absent company-specific 10-K disclosure, this section cannot be sourced to an issuer filing.