This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 12, 2026. If you represent NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH BARROW TOS FACILITY, you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.

No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.

ESG & Compliance Snapshot

NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH BARROW TOS FACILITY

· HQ UTQIAGVIK, AK

Last updated May 12, 2026

Located in North Slope Borough · Alaska

Executive Summary

The North Slope Borough's TOS (Tank, Oil, and Spill / truck-oriented services) facility in Utqiagvik, Alaska, is a municipal operation run by the Borough's Department of Public Works — not a private corporation. EPA ECHO records tied to facility registry ID 110031477989 show 8 quarters with noncompliance in the 24 months before the May 4, 2026 data pull, a derived 24-month penalty allocation of approximately $2.6 million, and zero currently active permits, with the most recent permit action dated November 30, 2024 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That compliance picture did not emerge from nowhere. The Borough carries a documented federal enforcement history stretching back more than a decade: EPA Region 10 reached a $445,000 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) settlement on July 30, 2015, covering hazardous waste storage and waste-determination findings in Barrow for the 2012–2014 period [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/epa-announces-445k-settlement-with-north-slope-borough/article_f81bad22-371c-11e5-a5fc-2bc59fadc0b4.html].

The 2015 settlement did not close the file. In 2022, the United States filed United States v. North Slope Borough, Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-JWS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, with the State of Alaska joined as a non-aligned party under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(e). The complaint is pleaded under RCRA and related federal environmental statutes [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl]. Because the entity is a municipal government rather than a SEC registrant, no 10-K or 10-Q record exists; ESG-style disclosure is limited to Department of Public Works program statements [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/]. One data artifact warrants explicit flagging: the EJ index in ECHO for this facility is reported as 0.0. That figure is a null or unreported value and must not be read as evidence of low exposure. The surrounding Utqiagvik population is a predominantly Iñupiat community with documented subsistence ties to nearshore waters and tundra [source: https://www.indianreservation.info/north-slope-borough-inupiat/].

Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)

$2.60M24mo

What they say vs what EPA shows

The North Slope Borough is not a SEC registrant and publishes no 10-K, 10-Q, or TCFD-aligned sustainability report within the research bundle. Its public self-description is confined to the Department of Public Works mission statement, which asserts that the department delivers 'a comprehensive range of essential municipal services' via 'strategic planning, efficient management' and infrastructure intended to ensure 'reliable services that support daily life, economic development, and community well-being across the region' [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/]. No quantified environmental targets, hazardous-waste diversion metrics, or compliance-rate disclosures appear in that statement.

The measured record differs sharply in specificity. EPA Region 10 found that the Borough stored more than 45,000 pounds of hazardous waste without a RCRA permit between 2012 and 2014 and failed to perform at least five required waste determinations. That resolved with a $445,000 civil penalty on July 30, 2015 [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/epa-announces-445k-settlement-with-north-slope-borough/article_f81bad22-371c-11e5-a5fc-2bc59fadc0b4.html]. The United States then filed civil litigation in 2022 in the District of Alaska, Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-JWS, citing RCRA violations, with the State of Alaska joined under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(e) [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl]. ECHO's May 4, 2026 aggregate reports 8 quarters with noncompliance in the trailing 24 months and a derived $2.6 million 24-month penalty allocation [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The gap, stated neutrally: the Borough's public-facing mission language describes service reliability and community well-being, while the federal enforcement record describes a second, post-2015 RCRA matter now in active litigation and an ECHO noncompliance quarter count at the maximum value ECHO reports — 8 of 8. The Borough's website, within this bundle, does not address the 2022 DOJ complaint or publish current RCRA generator status, waste-minimization metrics, or corrective-action milestones tied to the 2015 consent agreement [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/] [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl].

Compliance Snapshot (24 months)

EPA-reported violations8
Aggregate penalties$2.60M
Active permits0
Latest permit on fileNovember 30, 2024
Latest inspection

Compliance Overview

The TOS facility sits within the North Slope Borough Department of Public Works, Barrow Services Division, which operates vehicle, tank, and oil-handling functions for a road-isolated Arctic community reachable only by air or summer barge [source: https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/northslope/jobs/newprint/1645494] [source: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/life-in-utqiagvik-alaska-northernmost-us-city]. Public Works describes itself as the largest department within the Borough, organized into eight divisions covering municipal utilities and fleet services [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/]. That operational scope matters for understanding the compliance record: the regulatory history at this site is dominated by hazardous-waste handling under RCRA rather than by air or surface-water discharges.

The chronological record compiled from federal sources begins in 2012–2014, the violation window identified in EPA Region 10's administrative action. EPA found that the Borough stored more than 45,000 pounds of hazardous waste at Barrow without the storage permit required under RCRA and failed to complete at least five hazardous-waste determinations; wastes cited included antifreeze-contaminated material. The matter resolved on July 30, 2015 with a $445,000 civil penalty [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/epa-announces-445k-settlement-with-north-slope-borough/article_f81bad22-371c-11e5-a5fc-2bc59fadc0b4.html]. Follow-on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit activity in the same operational footprint — including Ikroavik Lake work under reference POA-2003-473-M1 — documents ongoing federal oversight of Borough-adjacent waters-of-the-U.S. activity [source: https://www.poa.usace.army.mil/Portals/34/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2015/POA-2003-473-M1,%20Ikroavik%20Lake_PN.pdf].

The current cycle opened in 2022. DOJ's Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Enforcement Section, filed United States v. North Slope Borough in the District of Alaska, with the State of Alaska joined under CWA citizen-suit-style joinder at 33 U.S.C. § 1319(e). RCRA is identified as a statutory basis in the complaint [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl]. ECHO's facility-level aggregation through the May 4, 2026 exporter pull shows 8 quarters with noncompliance across the trailing 24 months and a derived penalty allocation of $2,600,000, computed by ECHO's published method of prorating 5-year totals (total_5yr × 24/60) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The most recent permit event recorded for the facility is dated November 30, 2024; the facility currently shows zero active permits in ECHO, a status that in a municipal hazardous-waste context typically indicates either generator-only status or lapsed authorization. Separately, the Former Naval Arctic Research Laboratory (NARL) adjacent to Utqiagvik is under Navy PFAS site inspection per the August 2019 Sampling and Analysis Plan — a distinct federal action, but one that shapes the cumulative chemical exposure profile of the same community the TOS facility serves [source: https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Portals/72/Northwest/Documents/Final%20NARL%20Barrow%20PFAS%20Site%20Inspection%20Sampling%20and%20Analysis%20Plan,%20August%202019.pdf].

Enforcement Actions

Action 1 — EPA Region 10 RCRA Administrative Settlement, resolved 07/30/2015. Program: RCRA Subtitle C (hazardous waste). Facility: North Slope Borough operations, Barrow, AK. EPA found that between 2012 and 2014 the Borough stored more than 45,000 pounds of hazardous waste at Barrow without the permit RCRA requires and failed to perform at least five hazardous-waste determinations. Antifreeze-contaminated material was among the wastes cited. The matter closed as a consent agreement carrying a civil penalty of $445,000 [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/epa-announces-445k-settlement-with-north-slope-borough/article_f81bad22-371c-11e5-a5fc-2bc59fadc0b4.html].

Action 2 — United States v. North Slope Borough, Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-JWS, U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, filed 2022. Program: RCRA, with the State of Alaska joined as a non-aligned party under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(e), a Clean Water Act joinder provision. Plaintiffs' counsel of record: Zachary N. Moor and Helen Y. Li, Environmental Enforcement Section, DOJ Environment and Natural Resources Division. The matter remains in litigation; the complaint document is the primary record available in this bundle [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl].

Aggregate 24-month ECHO metrics, as of 2026-05-04: violation_count_24mo = 8 quarters with noncompliance (capped at 8 per ECHO methodology); penalty_total_24mo = $2,600,000 (derived as 5-year total × 24/60, not a single assessed fine); active_permits_count = 0; latest_permit_date = 2024-11-30 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Facility registry ID: 110031477989. No CAA or NPDES-CWA discharge penalties are itemized in the ECHO summary for the trailing 24 months; the enforcement signal is RCRA-weighted throughout.

Active Permits

No active permits on record.

Recent Violations (24 months)

No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.

Per-Facility Breakdown

North Slope Borough — Barrow TOS Facility (Utqiagvik, AK; FRS ID 110031477989). This is the sole facility in scope. ECHO reports 8 quarters with noncompliance in the trailing 24 months, a derived penalty allocation of $2.6 million, and no currently active permits as of the May 4, 2026 export [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The facility is operated by the Borough's Department of Public Works, Barrow Services Division. TOS Operator positions there carry federally mandated testing categories including post-accident and reasonable-suspicion drug testing — a detail that signals DOT-adjacent fleet and tank operations rather than a light-duty municipal garage [source: https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/northslope/jobs/newprint/1645494] [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/].

Site context shapes every compliance cost calculation here. Utqiagvik is the northernmost city in the United States, population roughly 4,500, reachable only by air or summer barge [source: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/life-in-utqiagvik-alaska-northernmost-us-city]. That logistics constraint is not incidental: it limits hazardous-waste off-take options and raises the cost of lawful RCRA disposal relative to road-served municipalities in the Lower 48. Waste that would move by truck in Anchorage must wait for seasonal barge windows or expensive air freight in Utqiagvik. Adjacent federal-site environmental conditions add another layer. PFAS investigation at the Former Naval Arctic Research Laboratory is documented in the August 2019 Site Inspection Sampling and Analysis Plan prepared for NAVFAC [source: https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Portals/72/Northwest/Documents/Final%20NARL%20Barrow%20PFAS%20Site%20Inspection%20Sampling%20and%20Analysis%20Plan,%20August%202019.pdf]. Waters-of-the-U.S. activity around the community is tracked via USACE public notices, including the Ikroavik Lake notice POA-2003-473-M1 [source: https://www.poa.usace.army.mil/Portals/34/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2015/POA-2003-473-M1,%20Ikroavik%20Lake_PN.pdf]. The receiving community is predominantly Iñupiat. That is a material environmental justice consideration irrespective of ECHO's reported 0.0 EJ index value — a figure this briefing flags as a likely null placeholder rather than a measured low-exposure result [source: https://www.indianreservation.info/north-slope-borough-inupiat/].

Facilities 2–5: not applicable. The ECHO summary enumerates a single facility in the scope of this briefing (facility_count = 1) [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Pollutant Context

The ECHO summary's top_pollutants array is empty, consistent with a RCRA hazardous-waste-handling enforcement profile rather than a reported-emissions profile drawn from TRI, NEI, or DMR data [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The operative chemical categories come instead from the primary enforcement record and adjacent federal activity.

First: RCRA-listed and characteristic hazardous wastes stored without permit and without proper waste determinations, including antifreeze-contaminated material. Ethylene glycol-based antifreeze can meet toxicity characteristic criteria when contaminated with lead or other metals. The EPA 2015 action specifically cited more than 45,000 pounds in unpermitted storage at Barrow [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html]. Second: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the Utqiagvik area. These are not attributed to the Borough TOS facility, but they are documented at the neighboring Former NARL site under Navy investigation. PFAS exposure pathways — drinking water, subsistence foods — in an Arctic coastal community with limited alternative water sources create cumulative-exposure considerations for the same population the TOS facility serves [source: https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Portals/72/Northwest/Documents/Final%20NARL%20Barrow%20PFAS%20Site%20Inspection%20Sampling%20and%20Analysis%20Plan,%20August%202019.pdf]. Third: petroleum and oil-handling residues, implied by the facility's TOS designation within Public Works fleet and tank operations [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/].

Exposure pathways in Utqiagvik are constrained and therefore concentrated. The community sits between Arctic tundra and the ocean, with no road connection and limited landfill alternatives. On-site storage duration for hazardous wastes tends to run longer than in road-served jurisdictions. Subsistence harvest — marine mammals, fish, caribou — is a direct exposure route to any release reaching nearshore waters or tundra [source: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/life-in-utqiagvik-alaska-northernmost-us-city] [source: https://www.indianreservation.info/north-slope-borough-inupiat/]. The ECHO-reported EJ index of 0.0 should be read as not-reported rather than as evidence of low burden. The surrounding population is a federally recognized Iñupiat community with recorded subsistence dependencies, and that fact stands independent of any data-system artifact [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Environmental Justice Context

EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.

Average EJScreen index

0

Facility-level EJ data unavailable.

Peer Comparison

NAICS 921190 (Other General Government Support) peer benchmarking is not available in the supplied research bundle; the peer array returned empty from the ECHO exporter join for same-NAICS facilities with comparable 24-month penalty totals [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. A qualitative anchor is available, however. The Borough's 24-month derived penalty allocation of $2.6 million is materially larger than its 2015 single-action settlement of $445,000. That comparison indicates the current cycle's cumulative exposure already exceeds the prior resolved matter — and the 2022 DOJ complaint has not yet reached judgment or settlement [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl].

Forward-Looking Risk Factors

No SEC Item 1A disclosure exists because the North Slope Borough is a municipal government, not a SEC registrant; the 10-K/10-Q fields in this bundle are empty. Forward-looking environmental risk must therefore be read from federal litigation and regional development pressure. The active federal complaint in United States v. North Slope Borough (Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-JWS) remains an open RCRA exposure until resolved [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl]. That litigation sits against a backdrop of accelerating industrial activity on the North Slope. The proposed Polar LNG nearshore project carries capital estimates of $8–9 billion, a targeted capacity of 7 million tonnes per annum, and a first-LNG target of 2029–2030 — a scale of development that would materially expand industrial activity within the Borough's jurisdiction [source: https://www.indexbox.io/blog/polar-lng-advances-8b-9b-nearshore-lng-project-on-alaskas-north-slope/] [source: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/up-to-9b-nearshore-project-on-arctics-horizon-with-polar-lng-unleashing-alaskas-gas/]. Legislative activity adds a fiscal dimension. Borough mayors have urged revisions to the Alaska LNG tax-break bill to avoid shifting costs onto local taxpayers [source: https://alaskapublic.org/news/politics/alaska-legislature/2026-03-31/borough-mayors-urge-changes-to-dunleavys-alaska-lng-tax-break-bill], and the House Resources Committee revised the governor's LNG bill in April 2026 in a bid to capture more revenue [source: https://www.adn.com/politics/alaska-legislature/2026/04/27/house-resources-committee-revises-governors-alaska-lng-bill-seeking-more-revenue/]. A separate $115 million federal port-facility award to Alaska — directed to Anchorage, Whittier, and Mat-Su — shapes the statewide logistics backdrop for Arctic-access hazardous-waste off-take, even though Utqiagvik is not a direct recipient [source: https://adn.com/business-economy/2026/04/23/feds-select-alaska-for-115m-to-improve-and-build-port-facilities-across-much-of-the-state].

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the North Slope Borough a publicly traded company?

No. It is a municipal government in Alaska operating the TOS facility through its Department of Public Works, Barrow Services Division [source: https://www.north-slope.org/departments/public-works/] [source: https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/northslope/jobs/newprint/1645494]. No SEC filings exist; ESG disclosure is confined to departmental mission statements.

What did the 2015 EPA settlement cover?

EPA Region 10 announced a $445,000 RCRA settlement on July 30, 2015 addressing storage of more than 45,000 pounds of hazardous waste in Barrow without a permit between 2012 and 2014, along with failure to perform at least five hazardous-waste determinations [source: https://www.epa.gov/archive/epa/newsreleases/north-slope-borough-settles-epa-hazardous-waste-violations.html] [source: https://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/epa-announces-445k-settlement-with-north-slope-borough/article_f81bad22-371c-11e5-a5fc-2bc59fadc0b4.html].

Is there current litigation?

Yes. United States v. North Slope Borough, Case No. 3:22-cv-00059-JWS, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska in 2022, pleaded under RCRA, with the State of Alaska joined as a non-aligned party under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(e) [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl].

Why is the EJ index reported as 0.0 if this is an Iñupiat community?

The ECHO summary's ej_index_avg of 0.0 should be treated as a null or unreported value rather than a measured result. The surrounding Utqiagvik population is predominantly Iñupiat with subsistence ties to nearshore waters and tundra — material environmental justice considerations that the 0.0 figure does not capture [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip] [source: https://www.indianreservation.info/north-slope-borough-inupiat/].

How was the $2.6 million 24-month penalty figure derived?

ECHO's exporter methodology prorates the 5-year penalty total to 24 months using the formula total_5yr × 24/60. The result is a derived allocation, not a single assessed fine, and should be read alongside the underlying 2015 settlement and the pending 2022 federal complaint [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip] [source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1484191/dl].

Sources

Similar companies

Browse all companies →

Related WME analysis