SAN JUAN 32-8 NO233 CDP NO47 WELL SITE

San Juan 32-8 No233 CDP No47 Well Site is a single-facility natural gas extraction operation (NAICS 211130) in Archuleta County, New Mexico, positioned within the San Juan Basin's Mancos Shale fairway. EPA ECHO's exporter dataset, as of 04 May 2026, records zero quarters with noncompliance over the trailing 24 months for facility ID 110040836110, alongside a derived five-year penalty allocation of $3,760,000 scaled to a 24-month window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No active permits appear in the ECHO export. No EJScreen index value is attached to the facility record [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The site is privately operated. No SEC filings — no 10-K, no 10-Q — exist because the well site carries no registered CIK, which removes the disclosure layer analysts normally use to cross-check operator-reported environmental risk. That gap matters. Contextual well-level production data for the broader San Juan 32 property shows cumulative gas output of 324,545,100 MCF across 178 wells between January 1993 and February 2026, with 936,857 MCF produced in February 2026 alone [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/san-juan-32/476306]. Those numbers confirm the unit remains an active gas-producing area, not a legacy holding winding down. Regional reporting reinforces that picture: Hart Energy documented a doubling of the Mancos Shale rig count over the past year, with Mach Natural Resources and LOGOS Resources validating new well economics across the play [source: https://www.hartenergy.com/upstream/shale-plays/he-mancos-shale-wells-gas/]. Separately, Source New Mexico reported a mixed forward outlook for the basin's fossil production trajectory, with conventional decline running alongside selective horizontal redevelopment [source: https://sourcenm.com/2025/08/25/oil-and-gas-forecast-for-new-mexicos-san-juan-basin-going-going/].

EPA ECHO's exporter bundle, pulled 04 May 2026, attributes zero quarters in noncompliance to facility ID 110040836110 across the trailing eight quarters, and zero formal, informal-enforcement, or judicial actions within that window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $3,760,000 figure surfaced in the ECHO summary is a derived allocation. The exporter's methodology scales a five-year total to a 24-month slice via the factor (24/60), so the number reflects an apportionment of historical penalty activity rather than a fresh 2024–2026 assessment [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Treat that dollar figure as a pro-rated lookback. It is not a newly imposed fine. No active Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, or RCRA permits are attached to the facility in the current exporter snapshot [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Over the past 24 months, no state-level enforcement filings against this specific well site surfaced in searches against New Mexico Environment Department dockets or litigation indices. The New Mexico Environment Department's Ground Water Quality Bureau maintains a public-involvement portal for facility-level groundwater matters, but the query returned no enforcement action tagged to the San Juan 32-8 No233 CDP No47 well pad [source: https://service.web.env.nm.gov/urls/NURGpWdn]. One sector-wide development is worth flagging. In April 2026, Capital & Main reported a lawsuit alleging ExxonMobil and other operators underreported $194 million in plugging-and-abandonment liabilities in New Mexico — a filing that names the practice of shifting aging-well cleanup costs onto the state as a deliberate accounting pattern [source: https://capitalandmain.com/oil-companies-accused-of-massive-accounting-fraud-in-new-mexico]. The San Juan 32-8 well site is not identified as a defendant in that coverage. The allegation nonetheless frames a sector-wide accounting question relevant to any private operator in the basin.

Operational context for the 24-month window adds texture to the compliance picture. Hart Energy's March 2026 reporting confirmed that Mancos Shale drilling accelerated sharply during 2025, with rig counts doubling and Mach and LOGOS well results comparable to other top U.S. basins [source: https://www.hartenergy.com/upstream/shale-plays/he-mancos-shale-wells-gas/]. Source New Mexico's August 2025 forecast documented a bifurcated outlook — conventional legacy production declining while select horizontal Mancos redevelopment accelerates [source: https://sourcenm.com/2025/08/25/oil-and-gas-forecast-for-new-mexicos-san-juan-basin-going-going/]. Aggregated well-level data for the surrounding San Juan 32 property shows ongoing gas production through February 2026 at 936,857 MCF per month [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/san-juan-32/476306]. Against that production backdrop, the absence of recent quarters-in-noncompliance on the single-facility ECHO record is the dominant compliance datapoint for this site.

Per EPA ECHO's exporter snapshot dated 04 May 2026, facility ID 110040836110 shows zero quarters with noncompliance over the trailing 24 months across Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, and RCRA programs [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No formal administrative penalty orders, judicial consent decrees, or Notices of Violation are attached to the facility in the exporter dataset for the 2024–2026 window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $3,760,000 total shown in the ECHO summary is an arithmetic allocation — the exporter's published derivation is `penalty_24mo = total_5yr * (24/60)`, meaning the figure is a linear apportionment of a five-year cumulative penalty total to a 24-month presentation window, not a record of discrete enforcement actions during that window [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Absent line-item enforcement docket entries, attribution of the derived dollar figure to specific CWA, CAA, or RCRA case numbers is not possible from the exporter feed alone.

No CourtListener or PACER matches for the well-site name surfaced in neural-search queries. No NGO complaint filings were returned for the facility slug [source: https://www.drillingedge.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/leases/san-juan-32-7-unit/9260]. The peer set sharpens the picture considerably. Red Hills Gas Processing Plant carries 8 quarters in noncompliance and a $19.1M derived penalty over 24 months. HP Gas Pad shows the same 8 quarters in noncompliance and a $16.1M derived penalty. Both figures come from the identical ECHO exporter methodology [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Against those benchmarks, the subject facility's zero-quarter noncompliance record and $3.76M derived allocation represent a materially cleaner recent enforcement profile.

San Juan 32-8 No233 CDP No47 Well Site (Archuleta County, NM; facility ID 110040836110) carries zero quarters of noncompliance in the trailing 24 months and no active permits listed in the exporter pull [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The facility is a single well pad within the broader San Juan 32 unit, which aggregates 178 wells across the property with gas production spanning January 1993 through February 2026 [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/san-juan-32/476306]. Only one facility is attached to this entity in ECHO, so no additional sites qualify for a top-five listing.

Surrounding unit activity provides useful scale. The San Juan 32 7 Unit, operated historically by Phillips Petroleum Co NW, contained 8 wells producing between January 1993 and August 2002, per DrillingEdge records [source: https://www.drillingedge.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/leases/san-juan-32-7-unit/9260]. That unit has since gone quiet. The adjacent Federal 32 8 26 property in San Juan County is separately tracked in ShaleXP's well-level dataset and constitutes a distinct operational unit [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/federal-32-8-26/407753]. Finally, the EJ Index is reported as 0.0 in the ECHO summary. In this dataset, that value signals a missing EJScreen composite linkage rather than a confirmed zero-exposure finding [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

EPA ECHO's exporter snapshot for facility ID 110040836110 returns an empty `top_pollutants` array. No TRI, DMR, or air-emissions inventory quantities are attached to the facility record in the current pull [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. That absence forecloses facility-specific exposure pathway analysis. For NAICS 211130 natural gas extraction operations in the San Juan Basin generally, the pollutant profile centers on methane (CH4) as the principal greenhouse gas emission, volatile organic compounds including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene from wellhead venting and storage tanks, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) where sour gas is present. Without reported quantities tied to this well pad, those categories describe the sector context, not confirmed emissions from this site.

Production intensity data fills part of the gap. Aggregated gas output across the San Juan 32 property reached 936,857 MCF in February 2026 alone, indicating that active venting and combustion sources continue operating in the surrounding unit [source: https://www.shalexp.com/new-mexico/san-juan-county/san-juan-32/476306]. Hart Energy's Mancos Shale coverage documents that rig-count acceleration and new horizontal completions across the basin have expanded the emissions surface area over the past 12 months [source: https://www.hartenergy.com/upstream/shale-plays/he-mancos-shale-wells-gas/]. For groundwater pathway concerns, the New Mexico Environment Department's Ground Water Quality Bureau maintains the standing public-involvement docket for basin-wide groundwater compliance [source: https://service.web.env.nm.gov/urls/NURGpWdn]. Until facility-specific reported quantities become available, analysts should treat the NAICS-level pollutant profile as directional context only.

Within the NAICS 211120/211130 peer set pulled from the ECHO exporter, San Juan 32-8 No233 CDP No47's derived 24-month penalty allocation of $3.76M sits roughly an order of magnitude below the top three peers: Greka Bell Compressor Plant at $26.2M, Red Hills Gas Processing Plant at $19.1M, and HP Gas Pad at $16.1M [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The spread is wide. On quarters-in-noncompliance, the subject facility matches Greka Bell at zero, while Red Hills and HP Gas Pad each register the maximum-observable eight quarters of noncompliance over the trailing 24 months [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The subject facility's compliance posture relative to this peer set is comparatively clean on the noncompliance metric. One caveat applies uniformly: every entity in the set — including all three peers — carries an ej_index_avg of 0.0 in the exporter feed, indicating missing EJScreen linkages rather than confirmed low-exposure siting.

No SEC 10-K or 10-Q filings are available for this facility. The entity has no CIK and no registered filer identity on EDGAR, so forward-looking environmental risk language cannot be sourced from Item 1A for this reporting unit. The closest public-record forward-risk framing specific to the basin comes from Source New Mexico's August 2025 forecast, which documented declining conventional production alongside concentrated horizontal Mancos redevelopment as the dominant forward trajectory for San Juan Basin operators, with attendant plugging-liability and emissions-monitoring exposure [source: https://sourcenm.com/2025/08/25/oil-and-gas-forecast-for-new-mexicos-san-juan-basin-going-going/]. That bifurcation matters for private operators: assets on the conventional-decline side of the ledger face accelerating abandonment timelines, while horizontal redevelopment zones attract new capital and new regulatory scrutiny simultaneously. The April 2026 Capital & Main lawsuit coverage — alleging $194 million in underreported abandonment liabilities across New Mexico operators — identifies a forward financial-risk vector relevant to any private well-site operator in the state, though the subject facility is not named in that reporting [source: https://capitalandmain.com/oil-companies-accused-of-massive-accounting-fraud-in-new-mexico].