This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 10, 2026. If you represent UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - BURTONSVILLE (MDBUR), you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.
No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.
ESG & Compliance Snapshot
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - BURTONSVILLE (MDBUR)
Last updated May 10, 2026
Located in Prince George's County · Maryland
Executive Summary
United Parcel Service's Burtonsville, Maryland facility (EPA Registry ID 110019881840) recorded zero quarters of noncompliance in the EPA ECHO 24-month window, yet carries an allocated penalty exposure of $2.12 million drawn from the five-year settlement pool. That figure represents the site's proportional share of the October 2022 nationwide hazardous waste consent agreement, which swept in 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. The site reports no active permits as of the most recent ECHO refresh on 04 May 2026, and its last permit action dates to 10 March 2017 — a profile consistent with a small-quantity generator rather than a major stationary source [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Environmental Justice index averages come in at 0.0, a result that reflects a Census-block proximity dataset returning no flagged demographic overlays, not an affirmative finding of low EJ burden.
Parent-level context shapes the picture materially. UPS posted $88.7 billion in 2025 revenue and moved 5.2 billion packages on an average daily volume of 20.8 million [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. At the corporate-entity slug, ECHO attributes 8 violations and $10.64 million in 24-month penalty exposure across 11 facilities [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Then, in May 2026, UPS announced the closure of 27 additional parcel facilities, lifting the 2026 shutdown total to 51 sites. That network contraction will measurably alter the company's RCRA-generator footprint going forward [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html]. The Burtonsville node sits inside a broader compliance narrative defined by the 2022 national settlement rather than any site-specific enforcement action.
Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)
What they say vs what EPA shows
UPS's 2021 Sustainability Brochure commits the company to carbon neutrality by 2050, 40% alternative fuel in ground operations by 2025, 25% renewable electricity at facilities by 2025, 30% sustainable aviation fuel by 2035, and 100% renewable electricity at facilities by 2035 [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf]. The UPS investor-relations sustainability page repeats the 2050 carbon-neutrality commitment and describes investments in alternative fuels, renewable electricity, and climate-conscious facilities [source: https://investors.ups.com/esg]. The 2024 GRI Report, published March 2025, formalizes those disclosures under the Global Reporting Initiative framework for the period 01 January 2024 through 31 December 2024 [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf].
EPA measured data tells a parallel story. The October 2022 consent agreement required UPS to implement environmental management policies at 1,160 facilities, indicating that at the time of settlement the company's hazardous waste compliance infrastructure required corrective overhaul [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. ECHO's 04 May 2026 snapshot shows zero Burtonsville violations in the 24-month window, which is consistent with post-settlement remediation taking effect at the site level [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. At the enterprise level, however, 8 violations and $10.64 million in allocated penalties remain attached to the primary UPS corporate slug across 11 facilities [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Two gaps warrant flagging for analysts. Neither the 2025 10-K Item 1A excerpt reviewed nor the 2025 10-Q excerpt contained specific environmental liability quantification beyond forward-looking-statement boilerplate [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm] [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm]. The 2025 interim targets for 25% renewable electricity and 40% alternative fuel fall squarely within the current reporting cycle. The 2024 GRI Report is the most recent primary disclosure source for measured progress against those targets, and analysts should read it alongside the 2026 network-downsizing plan that eliminates 51 parcel facilities — a structural change that materially alters the denominator of facility-level energy metrics [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html].
Compliance Snapshot (24 months)
| EPA-reported violations | 0 |
|---|---|
| Aggregate penalties | $2.12M |
| Active permits | 0 |
| Latest permit on file | March 10, 2017 |
| Latest inspection | — |
Compliance Overview
The dominant compliance event affecting this facility is the 19 October 2022 settlement between UPS and EPA addressing alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act at 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico. The agreement required UPS to implement corporate-wide environmental management policies to prevent recurrence of hazardous waste mishandling, and the allocated penalty flowed through ECHO's facility-level apportionment logic to sites including Burtonsville [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. ECHO's derivation notes confirm that the $2.12 million figure attached to MDBUR is produced by the exporter formula penalty_24mo = total_5yr × (24/60) — a pro-rated share of the multi-year settlement, not a discrete 2024–2026 fine [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Over the trailing 24 months, quarter-by-quarter ECHO snapshots record zero noncompliance quarters at Burtonsville. No new CWA, CAA, or RCRA formal enforcement actions appear in the ECHO exporter tied to Registry ID 110019881840 during the window ending 04 May 2026 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Maryland-level baseline statistics add useful scale: 37,190 regulated facilities, 10,611 recorded violations, and $110.3 million in cumulative statewide penalties place the UPS Burtonsville posture well below the Perdue AgriBusiness Salisbury complex and other top-ranked Maryland violators [source: https://pollutionscan.com/state/MD]. Historical Montgomery County land-use records, including the Burtonsville-area Superfund inventory, show the parcel hub operates in a corridor with legacy contamination sites, but no direct CERCLA linkage to the UPS operation has been established [source: https://www.homefacts.com/environmentalhazards/superfunds/Maryland/Montgomery-County/Burtonsville.html].
At the enterprise level, the chronology runs from the October 2022 nationwide RCRA consent agreement, through the March 2025 publication of UPS's 2024 GRI Report [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf], into the 17 February 2026 10-K filing covering fiscal 2025 [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm], and the Q1 2026 earnings cycle in which UPS disclosed the 51-facility closure program alongside GAAP earnings declines [source: https://www.tradingkey.com/news/market-movers/261853359-market-movers-ups-20260504]. The 05 November 2025 10-Q contained no incremental environmental liability disclosure in the excerpt reviewed [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm].
Enforcement Actions
Facility-level (MDBUR, Registry 110019881840): ECHO records zero formal enforcement actions, zero informal actions, and zero quarters in noncompliance during the 24-month window ending 04 May 2026. The $2,120,000 penalty_total_24mo field is an exporter-derived allocation from the five-year cumulative penalty total — not a discrete 2024–2026 assessment [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Parent settlement — 19 October 2022, RCRA, nationwide: EPA announced a consent agreement with United Parcel Service, Inc. resolving alleged hazardous waste violations at 1,160 facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico. Terms included corrective measures and corporate implementation of environmental policies to prevent future noncompliance. EPA's press release did not itemize Burtonsville separately, but the facility falls within the class covered by the agreement's general scope [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
Enterprise aggregate (slug united-parcel-service-inc-ups): 8 violations and $10,640,000 in allocated 24-month penalties across 11 facilities tracked under the primary UPS corporate identifier [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Two additional ECHO corporate slugs — UNITED PARCEL SERVICES (10 facilities, 6 violations, $6.42 million) and UNITED PARCEL SVC (16 facilities, 6 violations, $5.76 million) — reflect naming-variant fragmentation in the exporter. Analysts should read those figures as additive exposure rather than duplicative counts [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Permitting: The Burtonsville facility carries zero active permits and a latest permit action of 10 March 2017 in ECHO. That status is consistent with a conditionally-exempt or small-quantity hazardous waste generator classification, where episodic manifesting rather than continuous permitted discharge governs compliance [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Active Permits
No active permits on record.
Recent Violations (24 months)
No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.
Per-Facility Breakdown
UPS Burtonsville (MDBUR), Montgomery County, Maryland — Registry ID 110019881840: the single facility in this report's scope. ECHO shows no 24-month violations, no active permits, an EJ index average of 0.0, and an allocated penalty share of $2.12 million tied to the 2022 nationwide RCRA settlement. The latest permit date on record is 10 March 2017 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Montgomery County's Burtonsville area contains legacy Superfund-inventoried parcels, though none are attributed to UPS operations [source: https://www.homefacts.com/environmentalhazards/superfunds/Maryland/Montgomery-County/Burtonsville.html].
Because the input scope is a single-facility slug, comparative per-site ranking within the UPS network draws from corporate-level ECHO aggregates rather than individual site rows. Under the primary UPS corporate slug, 11 facilities collectively account for 8 violations and $10.64 million in 24-month allocated penalties — implying a per-facility mean of roughly $967,000. That mean places the $2.12 million Burtonsville allocation above the corporate average but below the settlement's largest per-site shares [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. For Maryland state context, Perdue AgriBusiness's Zion Church Road complex in Salisbury leads the state's violating-facility ranking, well above any UPS node [source: https://pollutionscan.com/state/MD]. A 1992 Maryland Court of Special Appeals decision involving UPS and the People's Counsel for Baltimore County addressed land-use and zoning rather than environmental compliance and does not bear on current RCRA posture [source: https://law.justia.com/cases/maryland/court-of-special-appeals/1992/315-september-term-1991-0.html]. No NGO complaints or Maryland Department of the Environment actions surfaced in the reviewed news and SERP sets. No active CWA NPDES or CAA Title V permit appears in ECHO for this site [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Pollutant Context
ECHO's top_pollutants field for Burtonsville returns an empty array. That result is consistent with the facility's lack of active air or water permits and its classification as a package-handling hub rather than a fixed-source emitter [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The enforcement signature for UPS's hub-and-spoke network, as established by the 2022 EPA settlement, centers on hazardous waste handling under RCRA Subtitle C — specifically the management of damaged shipments, spilled consumer products, lithium batteries, and small-quantity generator accumulation practices [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
Three categories most likely govern community exposure if noncompliance arose at a facility of Burtonsville's type. First, ignitable and corrosive damaged-package residuals — RCRA D001 and D002 characteristic wastes — whose primary pathway runs through worker exposure and stormwater infiltration. Second, lithium-ion battery thermal events from damaged e-commerce shipments, for which EPA has issued generator guidance; these create localized air-emission and fire-runoff risk that no stationary permit currently captures. Third, diesel particulate matter from ground-fleet idling, a Clean Air Act mobile-source concern rather than a stationary-source permit item [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
EJ implications at Burtonsville: ECHO reports an EJ index average of 0.0, reflecting dataset coverage rather than an affirmative low-burden finding [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Montgomery County's broader environmental inventory includes historical hazardous-waste corrective-action sites in the region, and that legacy shapes baseline cumulative exposure regardless of UPS operations [source: https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2015-09/documents/universityofmaryland_sb.pdf].
Environmental Justice Context
EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.
Average EJScreen index
0
Facility-level EJ data unavailable.
Peer Comparison
| Peer | Violations (24mo) | Penalties (24mo) |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
| — | — | — |
| — | — | — |
The NAICS 492110 peer set surfaced in ECHO is dominated by naming-variant slugs of UPS itself rather than independent competitors, reflecting the exporter's entity-resolution limits in the couriers and local delivery sector. Aggregated across the three UPS slugs, the parent carries 20 violations and $22.82 million in allocated 24-month penalties across 37 facilities. Within that envelope, the single MDBUR facility's $2.12 million allocation and zero-violation record sit at the low-incident end of the distribution [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The 2022 nationwide RCRA settlement remains the single largest driver of the peer-group penalty totals [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
Forward-Looking Risk Factors
The UPS 2025 Form 10-K, filed 17 February 2026, frames forward-looking environmental and operational risk through standard cautionary language and directs investors to the Investor Relations website for material updates. The filing emphasizes network transformation, the December 2025 USPS final-mile agreement covering Ground Saver and Mail Innovations volumes starting in 2026, and the company's strategic shift toward healthcare logistics following the acquisitions of Frigo-Trans and Andlauer Healthcare Group. That healthcare segment generated more than $11 billion in 2025 revenue. It also introduces cold-chain, refrigerant, and pharmaceutical hazardous-waste handling considerations that expand the compliance profile beyond the package-hub RCRA footprint that defined the 2022 settlement. Item 7 MD&A references collective bargaining agreements and critical accounting estimates, but the reviewed excerpt did not contain itemized environmental contingency reserves [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm].
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Burtonsville facility have any current EPA violations?
No. ECHO's 04 May 2026 snapshot records zero quarters of noncompliance in the trailing 24 months for Registry ID 110019881840 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Then why does the penalty figure show $2.12 million?
The ECHO exporter derives 24-month penalty totals by pro-rating five-year cumulative penalties using the formula total_5yr × 24/60. That $2.12 million reflects Burtonsville's allocated share of the October 2022 nationwide UPS-EPA RCRA consent agreement covering 1,160 facilities — not a fresh 2024–2026 fine [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip] [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
What did the 2022 UPS-EPA settlement cover?
EPA alleged hazardous waste regulation violations at 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico. The settlement required UPS to implement environmental management policies to prevent future noncompliance [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].
What is UPS's stated climate commitment?
UPS has committed to carbon neutrality by 2050, with interim targets of 25% renewable electricity at facilities by 2025, 40% alternative fuel in ground operations by 2025, and 100% renewable electricity at facilities by 2035 [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf] [source: https://investors.ups.com/esg].
How does the 2026 facility-closure plan affect the compliance footprint?
UPS announced closure of 27 additional parcel facilities in May 2026, bringing 2026 closures to 51 sites. Those closures reduce the RCRA-generator denominator and will alter future ECHO facility counts and per-facility intensity metrics [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html].
Sources
- EPA ECHO — facility exporter (Registry 110019881840) — https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip
- EPA — UPS nationwide RCRA settlement press release (19 Oct 2022) — https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide
- SEC EDGAR — UPS Form 10-K for FY2025 (filed 17 Feb 2026) — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm
- SEC EDGAR — UPS Form 10-Q (filed 05 Nov 2025) — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm
- UPS 2021 Sustainability Brochure (ESG targets) — https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf
- UPS 2024 GRI Report — https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf
- UPS Investor Relations — Sustainability — https://investors.ups.com/esg
- PollutionScan — Maryland EPA violations state summary — https://pollutionscan.com/state/MD
- Homefacts — Burtonsville MD Superfund inventory (Montgomery County) — https://www.homefacts.com/environmentalhazards/superfunds/Maryland/Montgomery-County/Burtonsville.html
- Justia — UPS v. People's Counsel for Baltimore County (1992) — https://law.justia.com/cases/maryland/court-of-special-appeals/1992/315-september-term-1991-0.html
- EPA Region 3 — RCRA Corrective Action Statement of Basis (Maryland context) — https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2015-09/documents/universityofmaryland_sb.pdf
- Yahoo Finance — UPS to close 27 additional parcel facilities in 2026 — https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html
- TradingKey — UPS Q1 2026 earnings and strategy pressure — https://www.tradingkey.com/news/market-movers/261853359-market-movers-ups-20260504
Similar companies
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA · 190 violations · $528.49M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC (UPS)
LA · 8 violations · $10.64M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES INC
TX · 6 violations · $6.42M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES
TX · 6 violations · $6.42M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INCORPORATED
OR · 2 violations · $4.24M penalties
Related WME analysis
May 13, 2026
How Clean Air Act Section 114 letters surface before formal EPA violations
A practical guide to reading EPA Section 114 information requests: how to tell a rulemaking letter from an enforcement letter, what the 30-day clock means, and why the response itself becomes evidence.
May 11, 2026
How to weight ESG limitations callouts in a vendor decision
A tiered methodology for assigning weight to ESG limitations across vendors, calibrated to CS3D value-chain scope and EU AML predicate-offence exposure.
May 8, 2026
How to find a supplier's last 5 RCRA hazardous-waste violations in 15 minutes
A reproducible workflow for pulling a supplier's most recent RCRA enforcement actions from EPA ECHO, benchmarking penalty exposure, and cross-checking state agency records.
