This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 10, 2026. If you represent UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - CABAR, you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.

No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.

ESG & Compliance Snapshot

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - CABAR

· HQ BARSTOW, CA· UPS

Last updated May 10, 2026

Located in San Bernardino County · California

Executive Summary

United Parcel Service's Barstow, California facility (ECHO registry ID 110070796406) operates within UPS's U.S. Domestic Package segment, a unit that contributed to the $88.7 billion in 2025 consolidated revenue disclosed in the parent company's most recent annual report [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. EPA ECHO data as of May 4, 2026 records zero formal quarterly non-compliance flags attributable to the Barstow site over the trailing 24 months. A derived penalty allocation of $2.12 million reflects a proportional share of five-year civil penalties attributable to this facility ID under ECHO's standard derivation methodology [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The site carries no active EPA-administered permits in the current ECHO extract.

That single-facility picture sits inside a materially larger corporate enforcement footprint. On June 16, 2021, EPA Region 6 announced a settlement requiring UPS and TForce Freight to correct alleged Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) violations across 183 facilities in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas, attaching a $3.8 million civil penalty [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement]. A follow-on October 19, 2022 nationwide RCRA settlement then covered 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico, primarily for hazardous-waste generator-category misclassifications [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://blog.stpub.com/epa-ups-settlement-provides-reminder-to-get-hazardous-waste-compliance-details-right]. Scale matters here. Those two actions together touch nearly every major UPS domestic operating location, and Barstow is not exempt from the corporate compliance obligations they imposed. Against that backdrop, the Barstow EJ index average of 0.0 in the ECHO extract reflects a data-completeness gap rather than a demographic finding and should not be read as an exposure clearance.

Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)

$2.12M24mo

What they say vs what EPA shows

UPS's 2021 ESG Highlights Brochure commits to specific, numeric environmental goals: 40% alternative fuel in ground operations by 2025; 25% renewable electricity powering facilities by 2025; 30% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in aircraft by 2035; 50% reduction in CO2 per global small package by 2035 against a 2020 baseline; and 100% renewable electricity powering facilities by 2035, against an overall carbon-neutrality-by-2050 roadmap [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf]. The 2024 GRI Report and the 2025 Sustainability and Community Impact Report update the disclosure under the heading "Building a bold and sustainable future" [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf] [source: https://about.ups.com/gb/en/our-impact/ups-sustainability-and-community-impact-report.html].

Set those statements against the EPA enforcement record. Two corporate-scale RCRA settlements landed in the five years preceding the current reporting window: the June 2021 Region 6 action covering 183 facilities with a $3.8 million penalty [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement], and the October 2022 nationwide action covering 1,160 facilities [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. Neither the 2021 ESG Highlights Brochure nor the 2024 GRI Report excerpt available in the research bundle surfaces a quantified RCRA compliance indicator — hazardous-waste generator-classification accuracy, for instance, does not appear as a tracked metric in either document [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf]. The gap is not between stated emissions targets and emissions outcomes — the public data bundle does not contain the 2025 attainment figures needed for that comparison. The gap is between the scope of the sustainability disclosures, which concentrate on carbon, renewable electricity and SAF, and the scope of the enforcement record, which covers RCRA hazardous-waste handling at roughly 1,160 domestic locations.

The As You Sow third-party environmental justice audit referenced in shareholder-engagement materials is directly responsive to that scope gap. Its existence signals investor pressure for disclosures that reach facility-level environmental-justice exposure rather than only corporate-aggregate carbon metrics [source: https://www.asyousow.org]. For Barstow specifically, the ECHO EJ index average of 0.0 is a data-absence flag. It neither contradicts nor confirms the corporate sustainability narrative [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

Compliance Snapshot (24 months)

EPA-reported violations0
Aggregate penalties$2.12M
Active permits0
Latest permit on file
Latest inspection

Compliance Overview

Reading the Barstow compliance record requires two distinct layers: the single-facility ECHO entry and the corporate RCRA enforcement history that continues to govern hazardous-waste handling at all U.S. UPS sites, including Barstow. On the facility-specific layer, ECHO's May 4, 2026 extract shows zero quarters with non-compliance over the trailing 24 months and no currently active Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act or RCRA permits listed under ID 110070796406 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The $2.12 million figure in the top-line summary is an allocation derived from ECHO's formula penalty_24mo=total_5yr*(24/60). It is not an adjudicated penalty against Barstow alone [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The 24-month corporate narrative opens on October 19, 2022, when EPA's headquarters settlement resolved alleged RCRA violations at 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico. The core allegation set involved misclassification of hazardous-waste generator status — treating sites as Very Small Quantity Generators or Small Quantity Generators when aggregated waste volumes would have required Large Quantity Generator controls — with downstream failures in accumulation time limits, labeling, contingency planning and manifesting [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://blog.stpub.com/epa-ups-settlement-provides-reminder-to-get-hazardous-waste-compliance-details-right]. Under that agreement, UPS was required to implement corporate-wide environmental management system changes applicable to all U.S. operating locations, Barstow included.

The 2023–2025 window brought continued regulatory attention to logistics-hub emissions in California. California Air Resources Board (CARB) comments filed February 20, 2023 on the Pepper 210 Commerce Center DEIR in San Bernardino County illustrate the review framework CARB applies to warehouse and parcel-distribution land-use changes in the Inland Empire corridor that includes Barstow [source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/CARB%20Comments%20on%20the%20NOP%20for%20the%20Pepper%20210%20Commerce%20Center%20DEIR.pdf]. The As You Sow third-party environmental justice audit of UPS, referenced in shareholder engagement materials, placed corporate-level attention on facility-siting and diesel-corridor exposure questions relevant to high-throughput western U.S. hubs [source: https://www.asyousow.org]. UPS's 2024 GRI Report, filed for the January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 reporting period, is the primary corporate document against which ECHO and EPA enforcement data should be compared [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf]. The February 17, 2026 Form 10-K, covering fiscal year 2025, does not disclose new material environmental proceedings in the Item 1A excerpt reviewed, and the November 5, 2025 Form 10-Q environmental-disclosure field is empty in the extract [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm] [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm].

Enforcement Actions

June 16, 2021 — EPA Region 6 administrative settlement. Respondents: United Parcel Service, Inc. and TForce Freight, Inc. Program: RCRA Subtitle C (hazardous waste). Scope: 183 facilities in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas. Outcome: 24-month compliance schedule plus enhanced corporate compliance program. Civil penalty: $3.8 million [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement]. October 19, 2022 — EPA headquarters settlement. Respondent: United Parcel Service, Inc. Program: RCRA. Scope: 1,160 UPS facilities in 45 states plus Puerto Rico. Core allegations: hazardous-waste generator-category misclassification and associated recordkeeping, accumulation, labeling and contingency-plan deficiencies. Outcome: corporate environmental management system commitments and corrective action [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. Independent compliance-audit commentary on the 2022 settlement notes that the root-cause issue was inventory classification rather than release events — a distinction that affects how residual risk is priced in subsequent reviews [source: https://blog.stpub.com/epa-ups-settlement-provides-reminder-to-get-hazardous-waste-compliance-details-right]. That framing matters: classification errors can persist silently across large facility networks until an audit cycle surfaces them, which is precisely what the 2021 and 2022 actions demonstrated at scale.

For the Barstow facility specifically (ID 110070796406), the ECHO extract records zero formal violations in the trailing 24 months and assigns a derived $2.12 million allocation representing a share of the 60-month settlement-penalty pool, not a site-adjudicated fine [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. No CWA NPDES, CAA Title V or Superfund CERCLA matters appear in the ECHO record for this facility ID in the current extract.

Active Permits

No active permits on record.

Recent Violations (24 months)

No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.

Per-Facility Breakdown

UPS Barstow, California (ECHO ID 110070796406) is the single facility in this record. ECHO lists zero quarters of non-compliance over 24 months, no active permits, and an EJ index average of 0.0 — a value that reflects missing EJScreen linkage rather than demographic clearance [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. Barstow sits on the I-15 corridor, a primary diesel freight route connecting Southern California ports to Las Vegas. That geography places the site squarely within the San Bernardino County logistics airshed that CARB has repeatedly identified as a priority for warehouse and parcel-hub emissions review [source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/CARB%20Comments%20on%20the%20NOP%20for%20the%20Pepper%20210%20Commerce%20Center%20DEIR.pdf].

The peer set sharpens the picture. The entity registered as UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC (UPS) spans 11 sites, carries eight violations over 24 months and $10.64 million in derived penalties — sitting above the Barstow entity on both enforcement counts and dollar exposure, and serving as the reference point for corporate-level RCRA residual risk [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The entity registered as UNITED PARCEL SERVICES covers 10 sites, six violations and $6.42 million in derived 24-month penalties [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The entity registered as UNITED PARCEL SVC spans 16 sites under NAICS 49211, six violations and $5.76 million in derived penalties — the largest peer by facility count in the benchmark set [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

The fifth reference point is the Inland Empire warehouse-and-distribution cohort subject to CARB's Indirect Source Rule framework. The Pepper 210 Commerce Center CARB comment letter, dated February 20, 2023, is a documented template showing the air-quality review scope CARB applies to new and expanded parcel-handling sites in San Bernardino County — the same county where Barstow operates [source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/CARB%20Comments%20on%20the%20NOP%20for%20the%20Pepper%20210%20Commerce%20Center%20DEIR.pdf].

Pollutant Context

The ECHO top_pollutants field for Barstow is empty, so the relevant toxicity profile is drawn from the pollutant classes identified in the 2021 and 2022 RCRA settlements that govern UPS's hazardous-waste handling corporate-wide. Class one: ignitable and corrosive liquids (RCRA waste codes D001, D002), typically arising in parcel-handling from damaged shipments of aerosols, batteries and adhesives. The exposure pathway is principally worker contact and transport-incident release. Generator-category misclassification for this waste stream was the central allegation in the October 19, 2022 settlement [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide].

Class two: lithium-battery and electronic-waste residuals — universal waste and D-code toxicity-characteristic metals including lead and mercury. Fire risk in transit is the acute exposure pathway; downstream landfill leaching is the chronic one if waste is mismanaged. EPA compliance guidance emphasizes accumulation-time and labeling controls as the first line of containment for this class [source: https://blog.stpub.com/epa-ups-settlement-provides-reminder-to-get-hazardous-waste-compliance-details-right].

Class three: diesel particulate matter and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from line-haul and yard operations. These are not RCRA pollutants, but they are the dominant community-exposure pathway at California logistics hubs. CARB's warehouse-emissions review framework, as applied in the February 2023 Pepper 210 Commerce Center comment letter, identifies PM2.5, diesel PM and oxides of nitrogen as priority pollutants for environmental-justice-adjacent siting decisions in San Bernardino County [source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/CARB%20Comments%20on%20the%20NOP%20for%20the%20Pepper%20210%20Commerce%20Center%20DEIR.pdf]. Center for Public Integrity reporting on California environmental-justice histories documents the cumulative-burden concern in agricultural and logistics corridors, providing the policy context within which CARB's review framework operates [source: https://publicintegrity.org/environment/pollution/environmental-justice-denied/the-decades-long-fight-in-a-community-treated-as-a-dumping-ground].

Environmental Justice Context

EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.

Average EJScreen index

0

Facility-level EJ data unavailable.

Peer Comparison

PeerViolations (24mo)Penalties (24mo)

Within NAICS 492110, the Barstow single-facility entity shows zero 24-month violations and a derived $2.12 million penalty share — materially below the three larger UPS-registered entities in the peer set. Those three carry eight, six and six violations respectively, with derived penalties of $10.64 million, $6.42 million and $5.76 million, all downstream of the October 2022 nationwide RCRA settlement [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip] [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. Every peer shows an EJ index average of 0.0, which uniformly indicates missing EJScreen demographic linkage in the ECHO export rather than an attained exposure baseline.

Forward-Looking Risk Factors

UPS's Form 10-K filed February 17, 2026 for fiscal year 2025 reiterates standard forward-looking-statement cautions and emphasizes the "Customer First, People Led, Innovation Driven" strategy, the December 2025 USPS final-mile agreement, and the Frigo-Trans and Andlauer Healthcare Group acquisitions. The Item 1A excerpt reviewed does not isolate a new material environmental proceeding beyond the general risk framing applicable to a global logistics network serving over 200 countries, delivering 5.2 billion packages in 2025 at $88.7 billion in revenue [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. The November 5, 2025 Form 10-Q environmental-disclosure field in the research bundle is empty [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm]. That absence does not close the forward risk picture. The October 2022 RCRA settlement imposed ongoing corporate environmental management system obligations across all U.S. locations, and CARB's expanding Indirect Source Rule framework continues to apply heightened air-quality scrutiny to parcel-distribution hubs in San Bernardino County — the county where Barstow operates. Both factors remain live compliance considerations for the facility in the periods ahead.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Barstow facility have any active EPA permits?

No. ECHO's May 4, 2026 extract lists zero active permits under facility ID 110070796406 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

What is the $2.12 million penalty figure and was it assessed against Barstow alone?

It is a derived allocation calculated as total_5yr*(24/60) under ECHO's standard methodology and represents an apportioned share of five-year civil penalties associated with the facility ID, not a Barstow-specific adjudicated fine [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

What did the 2022 EPA-UPS nationwide settlement cover?

It resolved alleged RCRA violations at 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico, primarily related to hazardous-waste generator-category misclassification and associated management requirements including accumulation time limits, labeling, contingency planning and manifesting [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://blog.stpub.com/epa-ups-settlement-provides-reminder-to-get-hazardous-waste-compliance-details-right].

Why is the EJ index average shown as 0.0?

The value reflects missing EJScreen demographic linkage in the ECHO export rather than a demographic clearance; it should not be read as evidence of low community exposure [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].

What environmental targets has UPS publicly committed to?

UPS's 2021 ESG Highlights Brochure sets targets including 25% renewable electricity by 2025, 100% renewable electricity by 2035, 30% sustainable aviation fuel by 2035, and carbon neutrality by 2050 [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf]; progress reporting appears in the 2024 GRI Report and the 2025 Sustainability and Community Impact Report [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf] [source: https://about.ups.com/gb/en/our-impact/ups-sustainability-and-community-impact-report.html].

Sources

Similar companies

Browse all companies →

Related WME analysis