This page is compiled from public EPA ECHO data through May 10, 2026. If you represent UNITED PARCEL SERVICES, you can claim or dispute any fact on this page.
No endorsement implied. Source citations on every claim.
ESG & Compliance Snapshot
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES
Last updated May 10, 2026
Located in Dallas County · Texas
Executive Summary
United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS; CIK 0001090727), the Dallas-headquartered package-delivery operator reporting $88.7 billion in 2025 revenue and average daily volume of 20.8 million packages, carries a concentrated environmental-compliance profile centered on hazardous-waste handling across its U.S. ground network [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. EPA ECHO records covering the subset of 10 facilities indexed to the united-parcel-services entity show 6 quarters of noncompliance over the trailing 24 months and a derived penalty total of approximately $6.42 million, with no active permits recorded and a most-recent permit action dated December 30, 2024 [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. A parallel ECHO record set tied to the UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC (UPS) parent slug shows 8 quarters of noncompliance and approximately $10.64 million in 24-month penalty exposure across 11 facilities [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Two multi-state Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) settlements anchor the enforcement record. The first, an EPA Region 6 consent agreement announced June 16, 2021, covered 183 locations in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas and carried a $3.8 million civil penalty [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement]. The second, a nationwide consent agreement announced October 19, 2022, reached across 1,160 facilities in 45 states and Puerto Rico and resolved for more than $5.3 million [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1541549/ups-to-pay-5-3m-nationwide-hazardous-waste-epa-penalty]. Those two federal actions alone account for more than $9.1 million in civil penalties. A California state action concluded August 4, 2025 added $1.745 million in penalties, cost reimbursement, and Supplemental Environmental Project funding — entered in San Bernardino County Superior Court with Riverside, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, and Yolo County District Attorneys as co-plaintiffs [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation]. Taken together, the three settled actions total more than $10.8 million and span a compliance arc that runs from 2021 through mid-2025.
Penalty trajectory (recent 24 months)
What they say vs what EPA shows
UPS's 2024 GRI Report opens with standard forward-looking-statement language and advances a sustainability framework built around a carbon-neutrality-by-2050 roadmap. The interim targets carried over from the 2021 Sustainability Report are specific: 40% alternative fuel in ground operations by 2025, 25% renewable electricity powering facilities by 2025, 30% sustainable aviation fuel by 2035, a 50% reduction in CO2 per global small package against a 2020 baseline by 2035, and 100% renewable electricity powering facilities by 2035 [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf] [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf]. The 2025 Sustainability and Community Impact Report frames corporate positioning as "driving innovation, advancing sustainability and investing in our workforce" [source: https://about.ups.com/gb/en/our-impact/ups-sustainability-and-community-impact-report.html].
EPA records present a differently-weighted picture. The 2022 nationwide consent agreement resolved alleged RCRA violations at 1,160 facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico — the same operational footprint through which the company's alternative-fuel and renewable-electricity targets are measured — citing failure to make land-disposal determinations and improper on-site hazardous-waste management [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. The 2021 Region 6 settlement covered 183 additional facilities [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement]. The August 4, 2025 California stipulated judgment post-dates the 2022 corporate-wide compliance program entirely. It indicates that hazardous-waste handling issues surfaced at California transfer facilities during the program's own implementation window [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation].
The 2024 GRI Report contains extensive forward-looking-statement caveats, but the pulled excerpt does not include verified progress percentages against the 2025 interim targets — the 40% alternative-fuel threshold and the 25% renewable-electricity threshold — leaving the gap between stated ambition and measured outcome unquantified [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf]. Independent emissions-tracking platform DitchCarbon maintains a separate assessment of UPS's Scope 1, 2, and 3 disclosures and peer comparisons [source: https://ditchcarbon.com/organizations/the-united-parcel-services-lp]. Readers evaluating the stated-versus-measured gap should weight the 2022 EPA consent agreement's population of 1,160 facilities against the 2024 GRI Report's operational scope to size the denominator correctly.
Compliance Snapshot (24 months)
| EPA-reported violations | 6 |
|---|---|
| Aggregate penalties | $6.42M |
| Active permits | 0 |
| Latest permit on file | December 30, 2024 |
| Latest inspection | — |
Compliance Overview
UPS's federal compliance profile under EPA is defined by RCRA hazardous-waste handling rather than by Clean Water Act (CWA) or Clean Air Act (CAA) stationary-source permits. ECHO indicates zero active permits across the indexed facility set and a most-recent permit date of December 30, 2024, consistent with a logistics-network footprint that generates hazardous waste — damaged shipments, returned lithium-ion batteries, automotive fluids from fleet maintenance, aerosols — but rarely operates Title V air sources or NPDES-permitted dischargers [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The derivation methodology reported by ECHO allocates 24-month penalty exposure by prorating five-year totals (penalty_24mo = total_5yr × 24/60), which means the $6.42 million figure for the 10-facility indexed set and the $10.64 million figure for the 11-facility parent-slug set both incorporate the tail of the 2022 nationwide settlement [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
The 24-month chronological record opens with residual compliance work under the October 19, 2022 nationwide consent agreement. That order required UPS to implement corporate-wide hazardous-waste compliance programs across 1,160 facilities in 45 states and Puerto Rico, citing failures to make land-disposal determinations and to conduct proper on-site management of hazardous waste [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide]. Compliance implementation milestones under that order extend through 2024 and 2025. Then, on August 4, 2025, the Riverside County District Attorney — joined by the DA offices of San Bernardino, San Joaquin, and Yolo counties — announced a $1.745 million stipulated judgment in San Bernardino Superior Court. The judgment comprised $1.4 million in civil penalties, $140,000 in cost reimbursement, and $205,000 directed to Supplemental Environmental Projects, addressing unlawful disposal of hazardous and electronic waste at UPS-affiliated California facilities [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation] [source: https://da.sbcounty.gov/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-inc-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-745-million-for-environmental-violations/] [source: https://kesq.com/news/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-7m-in-penalties-for-environmental-violations/].
Operationally, UPS disclosed on its Q1 2026 earnings call that it will close 27 additional parcel facilities in 2026, bringing the year's total to 51 closures under a network-downsizing program tied to the December 2025 USPS final-mile agreement for Ground Saver and Mail Innovations volumes [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html] [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. Facility closures carry direct compliance implications. RCRA closure procedures, decommissioning of maintenance-bay waste streams, and transfer of generator status all create near-term inspection exposure at each shuttered site. The Q3 2025 10-Q contained no material environmental-litigation disclosure beyond routine language [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm].
Enforcement Actions
Action 1 — EPA Region 6 Consent Agreement and Final Order, announced June 16, 2021 (pre-window, relevant as an ongoing compliance obligation). Program: RCRA Subtitle C. Respondents: United Parcel Service, Inc. and TForce Freight, Inc. Scope: 183 facilities in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas. Civil penalty: $3.8 million. Corrective action: 24-month compliance implementation across all Region 6 locations [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement].
Action 2 — EPA Nationwide Consent Agreement and Final Order, announced October 19, 2022. Program: RCRA Subtitle C. Scope: 1,160 UPS facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico. Civil penalty: greater than $5.3 million. Alleged violations: failure to make land-disposal restriction determinations; improper on-site hazardous-waste management; labeling and accumulation-time violations. Corrective action: corporate-wide environmental management system implementation and periodic reporting to EPA [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1541549/ups-to-pay-5-3m-nationwide-hazardous-waste-epa-penalty].
Action 3 — California Stipulated Judgment, entered August 4, 2025, San Bernardino County Superior Court. Program: California Hazardous Waste Control Law, Health and Safety Code; parallels federal RCRA. Plaintiffs: District Attorneys of Riverside, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, and Yolo counties. Total monetary obligation: $1.745 million ($1.4 million civil penalties; $140,000 investigative cost reimbursement; $205,000 Supplemental Environmental Projects). Allegations: unlawful disposal of hazardous waste, electronic waste, and customer-confidential records at UPS transfer facilities identified during waste-audit inspections [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation] [source: https://da.sbcounty.gov/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-inc-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-745-million-for-environmental-violations/].
Aggregated ECHO-derived 24-month exposure: $6,424,160 across the 10 facilities in the indexed set, with 6 quarters of noncompliance, and $10,640,000 across the 11-facility parent-slug set with 8 quarters of noncompliance — both values prorated from 5-year totals per ECHO methodology [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Active Permits
No active permits on record.
Recent Violations (24 months)
No EPA-reported violations in the past 24 months.
Per-Facility Breakdown
Facility 1 — FRN 110005040614. ECHO classifies this site within the indexed UPS set subject to the 2022 nationwide RCRA consent agreement. No active permits are listed; quarterly noncompliance contributions feed the 6-quarter 24-month count [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. EJ Index data is reported as 0.0 in the aggregated ECHO export. That figure reflects absent demographic mapping in the pulled subset rather than a measured zero; the underlying EJScreen values per FRN are not included in the provided data bundle [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Facility 2 — FRN 110070637385. Listed in the same ECHO extract, this site contributes to RCRA generator-status reporting under the post-2022 compliance program. No active Title V or NPDES permits are recorded [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Facility 3 — FRN 110005819962. Indexed among the 10 reviewed facilities. Facility-level pollutant and inspection narratives are not populated in the aggregated export; top_pollutants is reported as an empty array at the parent slug level [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Facility 4 — FRN 110031308662. Part of the indexed set feeding the $6.42 million derived 24-month penalty total. The ECHO exporter methodology allocates penalties by pro-rata share of the five-year total, so facility-level dollar attribution within this bundle is not itemized [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Facility 5 — FRN 110072043353. Most recently added to the indexed UPS facility roster, carrying the latest permit-related date in the dataset: December 30, 2024. No active permits are recorded; RCRA generator classification is the governing federal compliance regime [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The broader California case sweep — reflected in the August 4, 2025 multi-county stipulated judgment — covered UPS transfer operations in Riverside, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, and Yolo counties, though specific FRN mapping to those county sites is not provided in the bundled data [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation].
Pollutant Context
The ECHO extract reports top_pollutants as an empty array for both the 10-facility indexed set and the 11-facility parent-slug set. That result is a function of UPS's compliance profile being governed by RCRA hazardous-waste regulations rather than by Toxics Release Inventory reportable releases or NPDES effluent limits [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The enforcement record, read alongside the ECHO data, identifies three principal waste categories that define the actual exposure.
Hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle C — ignitable liquids, corrosives, reactive materials, and characteristic toxics from damaged consumer shipments and fleet-maintenance operations — is the core exposure category cited in both the 2021 Region 6 settlement and the 2022 nationwide settlement. EPA's consent agreement documents failures to make land-disposal-restriction determinations and to conduct proper on-site management. Those are the regulatory touchpoints for ensuring that listed and characteristic wastes do not enter municipal solid-waste streams [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement].
Universal waste and electronic waste, called out specifically in the August 2025 California judgment, carries exposure pathways through landfill leachate — heavy metals including lead, cadmium, and mercury from circuit boards and batteries — and through improper handling of lithium-ion cells that can cause facility fires [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation]. Diesel particulate matter and NOx emissions from UPS's ground fleet and from airside operations at hubs sit outside the ECHO stationary-source framework but are referenced qualitatively in UPS's 2024 GRI Report under Scope 1 emissions. Specific facility-adjacent air-quality EJ indices are not provided in the pulled ECHO data, which reports ej_index_avg as 0.0 due to missing demographic mapping [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf] [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
Environmental Justice Context
EJScreen national percentile across tracked facilities. Higher values indicate higher environmental and demographic exposure.
Average EJScreen index
0
Facility-level EJ data unavailable.
Peer Comparison
| Peer | Violations (24mo) | Penalties (24mo) |
|---|---|---|
| — | — | — |
The ECHO peer query within NAICS 492110 (Couriers and Express Delivery Services) returned a single comparator — the parent UPS slug itself — with 8 quarters of noncompliance, $10.64 million in derived 24-month penalty exposure, and 11 indexed facilities, versus the 10-facility indexed subset at 6 quarters and $6.42 million [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip]. The absence of FedEx, regional LTL carriers, or USPS contract operators in the returned peer set reflects either slug-matching logic within the ECHO export or the concentration of parent-level enforcement within a small number of large-entity filings. It is not an indication that competitors lack comparable exposure. The Violation Tracker database maintained by Good Jobs First aggregates multi-jurisdictional penalty data for UPS and peer carriers and can be used to triangulate [source: https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/violation-tracker/ca-united-parcel-services-inc].
Forward-Looking Risk Factors
UPS's February 17, 2026 10-K Item 1A section incorporates forward-looking-statement limitations and directs investors to the Investor Relations website for material-information updates. The pulled excerpt emphasizes strategic execution under the Customer First, People Led, Innovation Driven framework, the December 2025 USPS final-mile agreement, and the Frigo-Trans and Andlauer Healthcare Group acquisitions building a healthcare cold-chain portfolio that generated more than $11 billion in 2025 revenue [source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm]. Two environmental risk vectors intersect with that strategic picture. The network-downsizing program — 51 parcel facility closures announced for 2026 — triggers RCRA closure procedures and potential residual-contamination assessments at decommissioned maintenance bays [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html]. The expansion of temperature-controlled pharmaceutical logistics, meanwhile, increases refrigerant and cold-chain hazardous-materials handling exposure at the company's growing healthcare distribution sites [source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ups-ceo-says-drug-delivery-strategy-good-antidote-economic-uncertainty-2026-04-30/]. Both vectors create inspection surface that did not exist at the same scale in prior compliance cycles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is UPS's largest environmental enforcement action on record?
The October 19, 2022 EPA nationwide consent agreement, resolving alleged RCRA hazardous-waste violations at 1,160 facilities across 45 states and Puerto Rico for more than $5.3 million [source: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide] [source: https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1541549/ups-to-pay-5-3m-nationwide-hazardous-waste-epa-penalty].
What did UPS pay in the August 2025 California settlement?
$1.745 million total: $1.4 million in civil penalties, $140,000 in cost reimbursement, and $205,000 directed to Supplemental Environmental Projects, entered in San Bernardino County Superior Court on August 4, 2025 [source: https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation] [source: https://da.sbcounty.gov/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-inc-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-745-million-for-environmental-violations/].
Why does the ECHO export show an EJ Index average of 0.0?
The aggregated ECHO exporter output reports ej_index_avg as 0.0 for the pulled UPS facility set, which reflects absent EJScreen demographic mapping in the pulled subset rather than a verified zero. Per-FRN EJScreen values are not included in the provided data bundle [source: https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip].
How many UPS facilities are closing in 2026 and what is the environmental implication?
UPS announced 51 parcel distribution center closures in 2026 — 24 previously disclosed plus 27 additional — which triggers RCRA generator-status transitions and decommissioning of vehicle-maintenance waste streams at each affected site [source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html].
Does UPS's 2024 GRI Report quantify progress against its 2025 interim sustainability targets?
The 2024 GRI Report reiterates the target set (40% alternative fuel in ground operations by 2025; 25% renewable electricity by 2025) but the pulled excerpt does not include verified percentage-of-completion figures for those interim milestones [source: https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf].
Sources
- EPA ECHO — exporter bundle — https://echo.epa.gov/files/echodownloads/echo_exporter.zip
- EPA — UPS Region 6 Settlement (2021) — https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/united-parcel-service-inc-ups-settlement
- EPA — UPS Nationwide RCRA Settlement (2022) — https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ups-settles-epa-correct-alleged-hazardous-waste-violations-nationwide
- Law360 — UPS $5.3M EPA Penalty coverage — https://www.law360.com/real-estate-authority/commercial/articles/1541549/ups-to-pay-5-3m-nationwide-hazardous-waste-epa-penalty
- Riverside County DA — UPS $1.745M Judgment — https://rivcoda.org/UPS_violation
- San Bernardino County DA — UPS Judgment Announcement — https://da.sbcounty.gov/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-inc-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-745-million-for-environmental-violations/
- KESQ — California UPS Environmental Penalty Coverage — https://kesq.com/news/2025/08/04/united-parcel-service-and-affiliates-ordered-to-pay-1-7m-in-penalties-for-environmental-violations/
- SEC EDGAR — UPS 10-K (filed 2026-02-17) — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828026008432/ups-20251231.htm
- SEC EDGAR — UPS 10-Q (filed 2025-11-05) — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1090727/000162828025049661/ups-20250930.htm
- UPS — 2024 GRI Report (PDF) — https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/images/our-impact/reporting/2024-UPS-GRI-Report.pdf
- UPS — 2021 Sustainability ESG Highlights Brochure (PDF) — https://about.ups.com/content/dam/upsstories/assets/social-impact/2021-esg-highlights-brochure/en_en_2021SustainabilityBrochure_V15.pdf.pdf
- UPS — 2025 Sustainability and Community Impact Report — https://about.ups.com/gb/en/our-impact/ups-sustainability-and-community-impact-report.html
- DitchCarbon — UPS Emissions Profile — https://ditchcarbon.com/organizations/the-united-parcel-services-lp
- Good Jobs First — Violation Tracker, UPS California — https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/violation-tracker/ca-united-parcel-services-inc
- Yahoo Finance — UPS 27 Additional Facility Closures (2026) — https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/ups-close-27-additional-parcel-134020058.html
- Reuters — UPS CEO Drug Delivery Strategy (Apr 2026) — https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ups-ceo-says-drug-delivery-strategy-good-antidote-economic-uncertainty-2026-04-30/
- CNBC — UPS Q1 2026 Earnings — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/28/ups-ups-q1-2026-earnings.html
Similar companies
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA · 190 violations · $528.49M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC (UPS)
LA · 8 violations · $10.64M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES INC
TX · 6 violations · $6.42M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE - CLARKSVILLE
IN · 0 violations · $4.24M penalties
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INCORPORATED
OR · 2 violations · $4.24M penalties
Related WME analysis
May 11, 2026
How to weight ESG limitations callouts in a vendor decision
A tiered methodology for assigning weight to ESG limitations across vendors, calibrated to CS3D value-chain scope and EU AML predicate-offence exposure.
May 8, 2026
How to find a supplier's last 5 RCRA hazardous-waste violations in 15 minutes
A reproducible workflow for pulling a supplier's most recent RCRA enforcement actions from EPA ECHO, benchmarking penalty exposure, and cross-checking state agency records.
May 7, 2026
WhatsMyESG: A 2026 Review of the Public-Record ESG Snapshot Tool
A 2026 review of WhatsMyESG, a Tier 2 public-record ESG snapshot tool: pricing, methodology, and comparisons with Workiva, MSCI, Sustainalytics, EcoVadis.
